Cl Educate Ltd vs. Chief Administrative Officer
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Þ ITEM NO.44 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).35748-35749/2012 BAREJA AUTO MOBILES PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) NO. 17073-17074 of 2013 (With office report) Date: 26/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Marsook Befaki, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Goel,Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. K.L. Janjani,Adv. Mr. Shreyas Mehrotra, Adv. Ms. Kusum Chaudhary ,Adv Ms. Soumyashree Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Mayank K., Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan ,Adv Mr. D.S. Chadha, Adv. Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja, Adv. Mr. Vikash Singh ,Adv Mr. Ambuj Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Anubha Agrawal ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO. 17073-17074 of 2013 Deleted. Item No.44 -2- SLP(C) No.35748-35749/2012 Respondent Nos.1, 7, 10, 11, 12, 16 and 18 to 20 are reported to be duly and properly served but none appeared on their behalf. Respondent Nos.2, 3, 6, 9, 14 and 21 are granted four weeks' time, as a final chance, for filing counter affidavit on record. Complete set of the pleadings be served on the learned counsel appearing on their behalf and the necessary proof be filed in a week's time. Counter affidavits on behalf of respondent Nos.4, 5, 8, 13, 15 and 17 have already come on record but it appears that proof of service on the learned counsel for the other respondents has not been filed. The learned counsel has undertaken to file the necessary proof in a week's time. Prayer is granted. List again on 24.9.2013. | | | (M.A. SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR |
| | | |
rd