The State Of Maharashtra Secretary vs. Zamil Steel Building India Pvt. Ltd. Director

TTEM NO. $53$

COURT NO.2

SECTION IX

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1197/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-12-2016 in WP No. 5481/2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

ZAMIL STEEL BUILDING INDIA PVT. LTD.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

Respondent(s)

(IA No.139546/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.139547/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

WITH

SLP(C) No. $3376/2018$ (IX)

(IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 139774/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 139775/2017)

$SLP(C)$ No. 3383/2018 (IX)

(IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 127695/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 127698/2017)

SLP(C) No. $3504/2018$ (IX) ([TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH D.NO.38781/2017])

SLP(C) No. $3368/2018$ (IX)

SLP(C) No. $3375/2018$ (IX) (IA No.3121/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.3122/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

SLP(C) No. $3369/2018$ (IX)

( IA No.5955/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.5956/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Date: 19-03-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

For Petitioner(s) Mr.Shyam Divan, Sr.Adv. Mr. Kunal Cheema, AOR

Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Victor Deb, Adv. Ms, Apeksha Mehta, Adv. Mr. Punit Dutt Tyagi, AOR Mr. Ravinder Narain, Adv. Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Adv. Ms. Mallika Joshi, Adv. Ms. Neha Malik, Adv. Mr. Rajan Narain, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners states that there is no need to file rejoinder affidavit.

Insofar as the intervenor before the High Court is concerned, they appear to have filed the additional counter affidavit without seeking formal application for intervention in the present petition. The learned counsel states that he will move the necessary application.

List on 25th July, 2018, a non miscellneous day for hearing as the parties state that this will not take more than half a day.

We make an interim arrangement that any refund which may be required to be made by the petitioners in pursuance to the impugned order is stayed.

(USHA RANI BHARDWAJ) (RAJINDER KAUR)

AR CUM PS BRANCH OFFICER

2