Prashant Mahadeorao Buradkar vs. State Bank Of India (General Manager), Mumbai 400051

$|0| |2|$ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION RAFLCOURT: WI $213 - 214$ JRANSFER PETITION (CIVILI NO.6) OF 201 $S$ Prashant Mahadeora $B_{U \cdot G}$ dhov .Pelllioner. * VERSUS .....Respondent (` $S + q$ $e$ $Bq$ on $q$ India d. OFFICE REPORT The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Han-ble-Court / Ld. Registrar Court on $21)$ q) IY, 201 when the Court / he was granted / directed Enclosed copy. <u>. READY / FOR THE REASON:</u> <u>NOT </u> Accordingly, Notice was issued to the sole Respondent through Registered A.D. Post on ___as well as pastl / Ittrough Trial Court. It is submitted that unserved cover containing the notice has been received 2 back from sole Respondent with the Postal remarks,"__ 3. It is submilled that neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover has been received back from sole respondent so far. It is submitted that A.D. Card duly signed by the sole Respondent . has been.

received but no one has filed Vakalainama and memo of appearance on his behalf so far. $5 -$

ll is submilited that Service Report thus been received from the Tilal Court stating therein that

The counsel has filled an Africavil of service after effecting Dasti service on the Respondent No. | A-hes-not-liled-Afridavil of service of dast notice. $1h$ $T^2 - 21315$ $a_{0}d$ : R:Moi.land 2. in Tp= 214/18.

$(f \mid \alpha)^{|\mathcal{A}|}$ $\begin{array}{ccccccccc}\n9 & 15 & 10 & 10 & 10 & 10 & 10 & 10 & 10 & 10 & 10 & 10$ $\rightarrow$ $\overline{J}$ $e$ $-$ 2 $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ KITOLA IS ANY COMPLETE OR HOLD IN TP-213/15 GOR HOLD 214 $m:b$ is ban The matter (s) is / are listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report.<br>Dated this the q^th day of O e contact 2013. $214%$

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR $C$ opy to: "" " Mr. Shik Ur Sun Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Mr Kunel Verme Adu