Prashant Mahadeorao Buradkar vs. State Bank Of India (General Manager), Mumbai 400051

SECTION XVIA 7 |9-02-2-016 LISTED ON IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA <u>.D. REGISTRAR COURT:</u> 1 CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ITEM No. 213-214 OF 201 TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NOS Porashant Mahadcora Buradka ....Petitioner · VERSUS $\ldots$ Respondent $\mathbb S$ State Brute of India (General Manager), Munts in 400051 & 000. The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Hen'ble Court / Ld. Registrar Court on $[0 - 12]$ 7 201 Swhen the Court K he was granted / directed $\cdot$ . $\cdot$ Cory entlosed heretoidly" NOT READY / FOR THE REASON: 1. Accordingly, Notice was issued to the sole Respondent through Registered A.D. Post on _as well as Dasti / through Trial Court: It is submitted that unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from sole Respondent with the Postal remarks," It is submilled that neither A.D./Card not unserved cover has been received $3₁$ back from sole respondent so far. It is submitted that A.D. Card duly signed by the sole Respondent has been -teceived bul no one has filed Val¢alamana and memo of appearance on his behalf …… so far. It is submitted that Service Report has been received from the Trial Court stating $5$ fherein that 6 The counsel has filed an Affidavit of service after effecting Dasti service on the Respondent No. / has not filed Affidavit of service of dasti notice. It is submitted that Mr. Shir Kungar Suns, Advocate has on H/1/16 And<br>fresh afficiant of service of P Respondent no. 1 in T. R. (Unio. 213/15 and $7₁$ ces pordit nous 1000.<br>Servect by way af Blue Dart Courrier (915 Annexeurs 162 SERVICE OF NOTICE IS NOT COMPLETE. The matter (s) is / are listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. Dated this the $17^{3n}$ day of Februar 1 2018. $W^Q$ . ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CODVIO: Mr. Shiv Kumer Sivo?, Advocate NS 612 16 Advocate Mrs. Kunal Vierma ASSISTANT REGISTRAR