Umed Singh (Dead) Through Lrs vs. The State Of Haryana Through Collector
Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Arun Mishra
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:28 Jul 2016
CNR:SCIN010414962014
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
14 Jan 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION IV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1455 & 1463-1472 OF 2015
Umed Singh & Ors. etc. etc. ....Appellants
VERSUS
State of Haryana & Ors. etc. etc. ....Respondents
OFFICE REPORT ON PRE FINAL HEARING
Office Report is prepared as per Circular No. F41/Judl./2008 dated 17th December, 2008 :-
a) C.A. No. 1455/2015 : There are three respondents in C.A. No. 1455/2015. Respondent no. 3 has been deleted from the array of parties vide this Court's order dated 21.01.2016 passed in I.A. No. 8/2015. Notice has been served on respondent nos. 1 & 2 but no one has entered appearance.
C.A. No. 1463-1472/2015
S. No. | C.A.<br>Nos. | Total<br>respondents | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1463 | 3 | Respondent nos. 1 & 2 – Certificate of Service received<br>from High Court.<br>Respondent no. 3 – Represented through Mr. Vishwapal<br>Singh, Advocate. |
2 | 1464 | 3 | Respondent nos. 1 & 2 – Certificate of Service received<br>from High Court.<br>Respondent no. 3 – Represented through Mr. Vishwapal<br>Singh, Advocate. |
3 | 1465 | 3 | Respondent nos. 1 & 2 – Certificate of Service received<br>from High Court.<br>Respondent no. 3 – Represented through Mr. Vishwapal<br>Singh, Advocate. |
4 | 1466 | 3 | Respondent nos. 1 & 2 – Certificate of Service received<br>from High Court.<br>Respondent no. 3 – Represented through Mr. Vishwapal<br>Singh, Advocate. |
5 | 1467 | 3 | Respondent nos. 1 & 2 – Certificate of Service received<br>from High Court.<br>Respondent no. 3 – Represented through Mr. Vishwapal<br>Singh, Advocate. |
6 | 1468 | 5 | Respondent nos. 1 & 2 – Certificate of Service received<br>from High Court.<br>Respondent no. 3 – Represented through Mr. Vishwapal<br>Singh, Advocate.<br>Respondent nos. 4 & 5 - Deleted from the array of parties<br>vide this Court's order dated 21.01.2016 passed in I.A. No.<br>7/2015. |
7 | 1469 | 3 | Respondent nos. 1 & 2 – Certificate of Service received<br>from High Court.<br>Respondent no. 3 – Represented through Mr. Vishwapal<br>Singh, Advocate. |
---|---|---|---|
8 | 1470 | 3 | Respondent nos. 1 & 2 – Certificate of Service received<br>from High Court.<br>Respondent no. 3 – Represented through Mr. Vishwapal<br>Singh, Advocate. |
9 | 1471 | 2 | Respondent nos. 1 & 2 – Certificate of Service received<br>from High Court. |
10 | 1472 | 2 | Respondent nos. 1 & 2 – Certificate of Service received<br>from High Court. |
Service is complete.
- b) Original Record in the Appeal has not been requisitioned from High Court vide Office Order dated 08.12.2014.
- c) Not applicable
- d) Not applicable.
- e) No application for substitution is pending.
- f) Neither Counsel for Appellants nor Counsel for the Respondent have filed Statement of case. In terms of Rule 32, Sub Rule-2 of S.C.R. 2013, it is presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave to appeal (SLP)/Appeal, as statement of case, and does not desire to file any further statement of case. If the Respondent has not filed statement of case within the stipulated time as provided in Sub Rule-1 of S.C.R. 2013, it is presumed that the respondent does not desire to lodge statement of case in the appeal.
- g) No additional document has been filed by the counsel so far.
- h) Not applicable
Dated this the 19th day of May, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to :
- 1. Ms. Priyanjali Singh (Advocate) 2nd Floor, 57, Hemkunt Colony, New Delhi 48.
- 2. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh (Advocate) 13, Old Lawyers Chamber, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi-110001
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Shilpi/C-3
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search
Same Parties
Umed Singh (Dead) Through Lrs vs The State Of Haryana Through CollectorUmed Singh (Dead) Through Lrs1 Dharamwati2 Rajinder3 Ramesh4 Suresh5 Chhoti6 Shanti7 Phool Kaur8 Santro9 Satish Kumar10 Krishasn Umar11 Sarbati12 Birmati13 Ram RatiThe State Of Haryana Through CollectorLand Acquisition Collector Hissar (Huda)Randhir Singh (Deleted Vide Ourts Order Dated 21. 01. 2016 Passed In I. A. No. 3)
Lawyers
Search in District Courts Data
Umed Singh (Dead) Through Lrs1 Dharamwati2 Rajinder3 Ramesh4 Suresh5 Chhoti6 Shanti7 Phool Kaur8 Santro9 Satish Kumar10 Krishasn Umar11 Sarbati12 Birmati13 Ram RatiThe State Of Haryana Through CollectorLand Acquisition Collector Hissar (Huda)Randhir Singh (Deleted Vide Ourts Order Dated 21. 01. 2016 Passed In I. A. No. 3)Advocate Priyanjali Singh