Umed Singh (Dead) Through Lrs vs. The State Of Haryana Through Collector

WITH C.A. No. 5172-5184/2015 C.A. No. 1463-1472/2015 (With (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and Office Report) C.A. No. 5169/2015 Office Report) C.A. No. 5185/2015 Office Report) C.A. No. 5187/2015 Office Report) C.A. No. 5170-5171/2015 Office Report) C.A. No. 5188/2015 Office Report) C.A. No. 6047/2015 Office Report) C.A. No. 7005/2015 Office Report) C.A. No. 6905/2015 Office Report) C.A. No. 6903/2015 Office Report) C.A. No. 8410/2015 Office Report) Date : 28/07/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Priyanjali Singh,Adv. Digitally signed by RASHI GUPTA Date: 2016.07.30 12:21:04 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)

ITEM NO.89 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL

Civil Appeal No(s). 1455/2015

UMED SINGH DEAD THROUGH LRS. & ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv.

Mr. Shekhar Prit Jha,Adv. Mr. R. C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Rajendra Sahu, Adv. Ms. Hema Sahu, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Sahu, Adv. Mr. C. L. Sahu,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No.1455/2015

None appears for respondent No.2, despite due service.

Respondent No.3 has already been deleted vide order dated 21.1.2016.

The Ld. Advocate, Mr. Ajay Bansal, appearing on behalf of Mr. Gaurav Yadava, Advocate-on-record appears for respondent No.1. He seeks time to file vakalatnama. Be filed within two weeks' time.

Registry to process the matter for listing immediately thereafter before the Hon'ble Court, irrespective of the fact whether vakalatnama for respondent No.1 is filed or not.

C.A. No. 1463-1467, 1469 and 1470/2015

None appears for respondent Nos.1 and 2, despite due service.

Respondent No.3 is duly represented.

C.A. No.1468/2015

None appears for respondent Nos.1 and 2, despite due service.

Respondent No.3 is duly represented.

Respondent Nos.4 and 5 have already been deleted vide order dated 21.1.2016.

C.A. No.1471 and 1472/2015

None appears for respondent Nos.1 and 2, despite due service.

Parties have not filed the statement of case.

It is no more a mandate after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

Registry to process all the matters for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

Remaining matters

Deleted.

(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar