Prestige Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through Constituted Attorney Manishbhai Shantilal Patel vs. The State Of Gujarat Through Secretary State Of Gujarat
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
LISTED ON : 19.02.2016 BEFORE COURT NO.: 03 ITEM NO.:04
SECTIONIX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 3495034952 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.46 (Application for permission to place on record additional fact and documents)
AND
PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 3495534957 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
AND
PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 3496234964 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
AND
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 36240 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for permission to file lengthy list of dates.)
AND
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 36252 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for permission to file lengthy list of dates.)
AND
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 912 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AVANI INFRASTRUCTURE ETC. ....PETITIONER
VERSUS-THE COLLECTOR AND OTHERS ETC. ...RESPONDENTS
OFFICE REPORT
The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 06th January, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:
contd...2-
" Issue notice.
Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Mrs. Sumita Ray, Mr.Ankit Shah and Ms. Hemantika wahi,learned counsel accept notice on behalf of their respective respondents, returnable in two weeks. LIberty to serve the unserved respondents through dasti process as well.
Learned counselfor the respondents seeks an adjournment so as to enable them to file counter affidavit.
Prayer is allowed.
Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks.
Status quo, as it exists today, shall be maintained by all the parties. "
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34950 OF 2015
It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 21 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 19 is represented by Ms. Sumita Ray, Advocate, Respondent No. 20 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.
Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 18.
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34951 OF 2015
It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 4 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 21 is represented by Ms. Sumita Ray, Advocate, Respondent No. 20 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a
party in the instant SLP.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.
Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 3, 5 to 20.
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34952 OF 2015
It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent No. 1 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent Nos. 20, 21 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 19 is represented by Ms. Sumita Ray, Advocate, but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.
Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 18.
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34955 OF 2015
It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 4 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 21 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.
It is further submitted that Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has on 10th February, 2016 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.
Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 3, 5 to 20.
3
4 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34956 OF 2015
It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 21 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 20 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.
It is further submitted that Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has on 10th February, 2016 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.
Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 19
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34957 OF 2015
It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent No. 1 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent Nos. 20, 21 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.
It is further submitted that Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has on 10th February, 2016 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.
Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 19.
5 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34962 OF 2015
It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 4 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 21 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.
It is further submitted that Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has on 10th February, 2016 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.
Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 3, 5 to 20.
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34963 OF 2015
It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 21 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 20 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.
It is further submitted that Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has on 10th February, 2016 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.
Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 19
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34964 OF 2015
It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent No. 1 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent Nos. 20, 21 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.
It is further submitted that Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has on 10th February, 2016 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.
Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 19.
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 36240 OF 2015
It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are 21 respondents in the instant matter. Respondent No. 2 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 18 is represented by Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate after obtaining "No Objection from erstwhile Advocate,Ms.Sumita Ray,, Respondent No. 20 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocates and Respondent No. 21 (Proforma respondent) is represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.
Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 17 and 19.
..7/
6
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 36252 OF 2015
It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are 22 respondents in the instant matter. Respondent No. 2 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 18 is represented by Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile Advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray, Respondent No. 20 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate and Respondent Nos. 21 and 22 (Proforma respondents) are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.
Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 17 and 19.
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 912 OF 2016
The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01st February, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:
"Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.34950-34952 of 2015. Mr. D.N. Ray, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent Nos. 17 and 18. Let notice be issued to other respondents."
It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are 22 respondents in the instant matter. Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 17 & 18 but not filed counter affidavit. Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 20 and 21 but counter affidavit has not been filed. Neither A. D. card nor unserved covers containing notice has been received back from the rest of the respondents so far.
Service of notice is not complete on respondent Nos. 1 to 7, 19 and 22.
The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 18th day of February, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to: Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Advocate Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate M/s. Aura and Company, Advocates
L ASSISTANT REGISTRAR