Prestige Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through Constituted Attorney Manishbhai Shantilal Patel vs. The State Of Gujarat Through Secretary State Of Gujarat

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:19 Feb 2016
CNR:SCIN010414862015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

LISTED ON : 19.02.2016 BEFORE COURT NO.: 03 ITEM NO.:04

SECTIONIX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 3495034952 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.46 (Application for permission to place on record additional fact and documents)

AND

PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 3495534957 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF

AND

PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 3496234964 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF

AND

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 36240 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for permission to file lengthy list of dates.)

AND

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 36252 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for permission to file lengthy list of dates.)

AND

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 912 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AVANI INFRASTRUCTURE ETC. ....PETITIONER

VERSUS-THE COLLECTOR AND OTHERS ETC. ...RESPONDENTS

OFFICE REPORT

The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 06th January, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:

contd...2-

" Issue notice.

Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Mrs. Sumita Ray, Mr.Ankit Shah and Ms. Hemantika wahi,learned counsel accept notice on behalf of their respective respondents, returnable in two weeks. LIberty to serve the unserved respondents through dasti process as well.

Learned counselfor the respondents seeks an adjournment so as to enable them to file counter affidavit.

Prayer is allowed.

Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks.

Status quo, as it exists today, shall be maintained by all the parties. "

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34950 OF 2015

It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 21 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 19 is represented by Ms. Sumita Ray, Advocate, Respondent No. 20 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.

It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.

Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 18.

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34951 OF 2015

It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 4 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 21 is represented by Ms. Sumita Ray, Advocate, Respondent No. 20 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a

party in the instant SLP.

It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.

Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 3, 5 to 20.

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34952 OF 2015

It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent No. 1 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent Nos. 20, 21 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 19 is represented by Ms. Sumita Ray, Advocate, but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.

It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.

Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 18.

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34955 OF 2015

It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 4 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 21 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.

It is further submitted that Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has on 10th February, 2016 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray.

It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.

Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 3, 5 to 20.

3

4 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34956 OF 2015

It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 21 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 20 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.

It is further submitted that Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has on 10th February, 2016 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray.

It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.

Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 19

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34957 OF 2015

It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent No. 1 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent Nos. 20, 21 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.

It is further submitted that Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has on 10th February, 2016 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray.

It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.

Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 19.

5 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34962 OF 2015

It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 4 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 21 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.

It is further submitted that Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has on 10th February, 2016 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray.

It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.

Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 3, 5 to 20.

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34963 OF 2015

It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 21 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 20 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.

It is further submitted that Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has on 10th February, 2016 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray.

It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.

Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 19

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 34964 OF 2015

It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are twenty two respondents in the instant matter. Respondent No. 1 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent Nos. 20, 21 and 22 are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.

It is further submitted that Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has on 10th February, 2016 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray.

It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.

Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 19.

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 36240 OF 2015

It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are 21 respondents in the instant matter. Respondent No. 2 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 18 is represented by Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate after obtaining "No Objection from erstwhile Advocate,Ms.Sumita Ray,, Respondent No. 20 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocates and Respondent No. 21 (Proforma respondent) is represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.

It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.

Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 17 and 19.

..7/

6

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 36252 OF 2015

It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are 22 respondents in the instant matter. Respondent No. 2 is represented by Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate, Respondent No. 18 is represented by Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate after obtaining "No Objection" from erstwhile Advocate, Ms. Sumita Ray, Respondent No. 20 is represented by M/s. Aura and Company, Advocate and Respondent Nos. 21 and 22 (Proforma respondents) are represented by Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, but no one has filed counter affidavit on behalf of their respective respondents so far. Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate has filed caveat on behalf of M/s. Ganesh Infrastructure but the same is not a party in the instant SLP.

It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service so far.

Service of notice is awaited on respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 17 and 19.

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 912 OF 2016

The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01st February, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:

"Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.34950-34952 of 2015. Mr. D.N. Ray, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent Nos. 17 and 18. Let notice be issued to other respondents."

It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are 22 respondents in the instant matter. Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 17 & 18 but not filed counter affidavit. Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 20 and 21 but counter affidavit has not been filed. Neither A. D. card nor unserved covers containing notice has been received back from the rest of the respondents so far.

Service of notice is not complete on respondent Nos. 1 to 7, 19 and 22.

The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 18th day of February, 2016.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to: Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Advocate Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Advocate Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate M/s. Aura and Company, Advocates

L ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(75) - 12 Aug 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(74) - 26 Jul 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(73) - 2 May 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(72) - 18 Apr 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(71) - 11 Oct 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(70) - 21 Sept 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(69) - 14 Sept 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(68) - 25 Aug 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(67) - 3 Aug 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(66) - 19 Jul 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(65) - 12 Jul 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(64) - 4 Jul 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(63) - 28 Mar 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(62) - 4 May 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(61) - 8 Mar 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(60) - 10 Feb 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(59) - 27 Jan 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(58) - 22 Jan 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(57) - 14 Nov 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(56) - 9 Jul 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(55) - 5 Mar 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(54) - 4 Feb 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(53) - 5 Dec 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(52) - 13 Nov 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(51) - 13 Sept 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(50) - 11 Sept 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(49) - 3 Apr 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(48) - 6 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(47) - 22 Jan 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(46) - 28 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(45) - 31 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(44) - 10 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(43) - 8 Sept 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(42) - 1 Sept 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(41) - 13 Jul 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 4 May 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(40) - 4 May 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(37) - 1 May 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(38) - 1 May 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(35) - 5 Apr 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(36) - 5 Apr 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(34) - 9 Mar 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(32) - 6 Mar 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 6 Mar 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 2 Feb 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 2 Feb 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 1 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(28) - 1 Feb 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(29) - 1 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(25) - 2 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 2 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 26 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 26 Oct 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 26 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 17 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 17 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 15 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 15 Jul 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(18) - 15 Jul 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 15 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 13 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(15) - 13 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 11 Jul 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(10) - 13 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 13 May 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 13 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 19 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 19 Feb 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(9) - 19 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 1 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 1 Feb 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(6) - 1 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 6 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 6 Jan 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 6 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Prestige Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through Constituted Attorney Manishbhai Shantilal Patel vs The State Of Gujarat Through Secretary State Of GujaratPrestige Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through Constituted Attorney Manishbhai Shantilal PatelThe State Of Gujarat Through Secretary State Of GujaratState Of Gujarat Through SecretaryThe Liquidator Petrofils Cooperative Limited (In Liquidation)Industrial Development Bank Of India Ltd. (Idbi Ltd. ) Through Its Deputy General ManagerInvest Arc LimitedState Bank Of India Through Its Manager Stressed AssetsDena Bank Through Its Branch ManagerCentral Bank Of India Through Its Branch ManagerIndian Overseas Bank Through Its Branch ManagerIndian Bank Through Its Branch ManagerIfci Ltd. Through ManagerLife Insurance Corporation Of India Through ManagerBank Of Baroda Through ManagerAdministrator Of A Special Undertaking Of The Unit Trust Of India Through By Its AdministratorThe Uti Trust Company Ltd. Through Authorized OfficerNational Cooperative Development Corporation Development (N. C. D. C) Through Its SecretaryCorus Visat Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. Vikramsinh MagrolaStandard Chartered Bank Through Its Branch ManagerAspire Confra Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Authorized OfficerAvni Infrastructure Through Its PartnerGujarat Industrial Development Corporation Through Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorThe CollectorState Bank Of India Through Its Manager StressDena Bank ThroughIfci Limited Through ManagerNational Cooperative Development (N. C. D. C) Through Its SecretaryCorus Visat Infrstructure Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. Vikrmsinh MagrolaAdministrative Of A Special Undertaking Of The Unit Trust Of India Through Its Administrator

Search in District Courts Data

Prestige Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through Constituted Attorney Manishbhai Shantilal PatelThe State Of Gujarat Through Secretary State Of GujaratState Of Gujarat Through SecretaryThe Liquidator Petrofils Cooperative Limited (In Liquidation)Industrial Development Bank Of India Ltd. (Idbi Ltd. ) Through Its Deputy General ManagerInvest Arc LimitedState Bank Of India Through Its Manager Stressed AssetsDena Bank Through Its Branch ManagerCentral Bank Of India Through Its Branch ManagerIndian Overseas Bank Through Its Branch ManagerIndian Bank Through Its Branch ManagerIfci Ltd. Through ManagerLife Insurance Corporation Of India Through ManagerBank Of Baroda Through ManagerAdministrator Of A Special Undertaking Of The Unit Trust Of India Through By Its AdministratorThe Uti Trust Company Ltd. Through Authorized OfficerNational Cooperative Development Corporation Development (N. C. D. C) Through Its SecretaryCorus Visat Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. Vikramsinh MagrolaStandard Chartered Bank Through Its Branch ManagerAspire Confra Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Authorized OfficerAvni Infrastructure Through Its PartnerGujarat Industrial Development Corporation Through Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorThe CollectorState Bank Of India Through Its Manager StressDena Bank ThroughIfci Limited Through ManagerNational Cooperative Development (N. C. D. C) Through Its SecretaryCorus Visat Infrstructure Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. Vikrmsinh MagrolaAdministrative Of A Special Undertaking Of The Unit Trust Of India Through Its AdministratorAdvocate Nachiketa JoshiAdvocate Soumya PriyadarshineeAdvocate Soumya PriyadarshineeAdvocate Kanu AgrawalAdvocate Deepanwita PriyankaAdvocate Rabin MajumderAdvocate E. C. AgrawalaAdvocate Aura & Co.Advocate Vinam Gupta