Saji Ulahannan vs. The State Of Kerala State Of Kerala
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30103/2015
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30/09/2015 in WPC No. 10694/2015 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam)
T.K. THOMAS AND ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
PARISTHITHY SAMRAKSHANA JANAKEEYA SAMITHI AND ORS. Respondent(s)
(with interim relief and office report)
WITH SLP(C) No. 32072/2015 (With Office Report)
SLP(C) No. 33130/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)
Date: 07/12/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Haris Beeran,Adv. |
|---|---|
| (SLP 30103/15) | Mr. Mushtq Salim,Adv. |
| Mr. Radha Shyam Jena,Adv. | |
| (SLP 32072/15) | Mr. T. V. George,Adv. |
| (SLP 33130/15) | Mr. K. K. Venugopal,Sr.Adv. |
| Dr. Mathew Kughalnadan,Adv. | |
| Mr. Kuriakose Varghese,Adv. | |
| Mr. V. Shyamohan,Adv. | |
| Mr. Apoorv Damodaran,Adv. | |
| Mr. Shreyas Mehrotra,Adv. | |
| Mr. Aju Mathew,Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Ramesh Babu M.R.,Adv. |
| Mr. Renjith B. Marar,Adv. | |
| Mr. Biji Mathew,Adv. |
Heard.
Mr. Ramesh Babu M.R., learned counsel appearing for respondents no.1 to 4, accepts notice in SLP (C) No.33130 of 2015. He prays for and is granted six weeks to file a counter affidavit. Fresh notice shall issue for the service of the unserved respondents. Post along with SLP(C) No.30103 of 2015 and connected matters.
Status quo shall be maintained by the parties as it exists today in SLP(C) NO(s).33130 of 2015 and 32072 of 2015.
At this stage, Mr. Ramesh Babu submits on instructions that the State of Kerala shall, pending further orders from this Court, renew all existing permits for a further period of one year and the status quo order shall not be interpreted to mean that the same is an impediment for such renewal. That submission is recorded.
Post after needful is done.
(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER