Landbase India Ltd. Through Mr. Atul Kumar Constituted Attorney vs. The State Of Haryana State Of Haryana Excise And Taxation Department Through Its Financial Commissioner And Principal Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
¢ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13014/2010 M/S DLF GOLF RESORTS LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to file additional documents and office report ) WITH Civil Appeal NO. 2524 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 25490 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 30638 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 31648 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Civil Appeal NO. 5439 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Civil Appeal NO. 5440 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Civil Appeal NO. 5441 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 6348-6349 of 2012 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 7578 of 2012 (With office report) Appeal Civil D NO. D5904 of 2012 (With office report) Date: 19/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Ajay Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. Rajan Narain,Adv. Mr Mohit Paul, Adv. Mr. Anip Sachthey,Adv. Mr. Ashwani Kumar,Adv. -2- Item No.6 Ms Pallavi Sharma, Adv. M/S. Parekh & Co.,Adv. Mr Anirudh Arun Kumar, Adv. M/S. Dua Associates,Adv. Mr. Umang Shankar,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr Suryanaryana Singh, Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv. Mr. Devashish Bharuka,Adv. Mr D.P.Mohanty, Adv. Mr Sameer Parekh, Adv. M/S. Parekh & Co.,Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Nobody is present for the petitioner in SLP(C) Nos. 6348-49 and 7578 of 2012 therein respondents are yet unserved till date. Let there be fresh dasti notice which is permitted to be served through the nearest Civil Court/Trial Court/standing counsel if process fee and spare copies are paid before 30.3.2012 else list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution.
As last chance, petitioner in SLP(C) No. 30638,31648 of 2011 has to comply with the order dated 25.1.2012 on or before 30.3.2012 i.e., to pay process fee and spare copies for issuance of fresh dasti notices upon unserved respondents. If process fee and spare copies are not paid till 30.3.3012, list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution.
Registry has to explain in writing to the undersigned that why the order dated 25.1.2012 has not been complied with which specifically directs that in absence of process fee before 4.2.2012, matter shall be listed for non-prosecution before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.
-3-
Item No.6
CIVIL APPEAL NO.D5904/2012
Deleted.
REMAINING CIVIL APPEALS
Parties may file statement of case.
If notices are issued, list again on 1.5.2012.
REGISTRAR