Manisha Kaushal vs. S. V. P. Builders (India) Ltd

¾ITEM NO.29 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 1132/2016 MANISHA KAUSHAL AND ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS S.V.P. BUILDERS (INDIA) LTD. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With Office Report) Date : 21/03/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr.Pratap Venugopal,Adv. Ms.Niharika,Adv. M/s. K. J. John & Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.C.K.Jha,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.10, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. The respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. As per postal tracking report in respect of respondent No.2, the remarks shows that ⬠SLeft⬠\235. Hence, Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. As per tracking report, notice sent to the respondent No.8 has been received back undelivered. Hence, Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the said respondent within a period of four weeks and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. ⬠¦...2 ITEM NO.29 -2- AC1132/2016 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps

in respect of the respondent Nos.3-7 and 9 within two weeks. List the matter again on 01.05.2017.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

SB