Mohammed Faizal vs. U. T. Administration Of Lakshadweep

ITEM NO.28

COURT NO.4

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 12819/2023

[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 03-10-2023 in CRMA No. 1/2023 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam]

MOHAMMED FAIZAL

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

U. T. ADMINISTRATION OF LAKSHADWEEP & ORS. Respondent $(s)$

(IA NO.205314/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.205315/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )

Date: 22-11-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI

• For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. R. Sasiprabhu, AOR Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma A S, Adv. Mr. Prakhar Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Purohit, Adv. Mr. Jatin Lalwani, Adv.
• For Respondent(s) Dr. Menaka Guruswamy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, AOR Mr. Ibad Mushtaq, Adv.
  • Mr. K.M. Nataraj, A.S.G.
  • Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, AOR
  • Mr. Anuj Udupa, Adv.
  • Ms. Drishti Saraf, Adv.
  • Ms. Pragya Upadhyay, Adv.
  • Ms. Swati Mishra, Adv.
  • Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General Mr. K.M Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv. Mr. Anuj Srinivas Udupa, Adv.
  • Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0$ R D F R

Mr. Prakhar Agarwal, learned counsel prays for an adjournment.

2 Mr. K.M. Nataraj, learned Additional Solicitor General, however, submits that the issue pertains to participation in the Parliament but in the last Lok Sabha Election, the petitioner lost the election and therefore, the issue here has largely become academic.

3. Be that as it may, as prayed for by the counsel for the petitioner, the matter stands adjourned by four weeks.

(GEETA JOSHI) (KAMLESH RAWAT) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR