Mohammed Faizal vs. U. T. Administration Of Lakshadweep
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
After Week/Month/Vacation
Before:
Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy, Hon'ble Prashant Kumar Mishra
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
List before court/bench [as per rop]
Listed On:
25 Jan 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.36
COURT NO. $6$
SECTION II-B
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 12819/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-10-2023 in CRMA No. 1/2023 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam)
MOHAMMED FAIZAL
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
U. T. ADMINISTRATION OF LAKSHADWEEP & ORS. Respondent $(s)$
(IA No.205314/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.205315/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )
Date: 25-01-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. K. R. Sasiprabhu, AOR<br>Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. Koya Arafa Mirage, Adv.<br>Mr. Vishnu Sharma A S, Adv.<br>Mr. Nikhil Purohit, Adv.<br>Mr. Jatin Lalwani, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhik Chimni, Adv.<br>Mr. Kartikeya Astana, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Dr. Menaka Guruswamy, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, AOR<br>Mr. Ibad Mushtaq, Adv.<br>Ms. Akanksha Rai, Adv.<br>Mr. Lavkesh Bhambhani, Adv.<br>Mr. Utkarsh Pratap, Adv.<br>Mr. Harshwardhan Thakur, Adv.<br>Dr. Navya Jannu, Adv. |
| Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally signed by<br>Jayant Kumar Arora<br>Date: 2024-01.29<br>18:18:38 IST<br>Reason: | Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G.<br>Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, AOR<br>Mr. Anuj Udupa, Adv.<br>Ms. Anjali Kumari, Adv.<br>Mr. Samyak Jain, Adv.<br>Mr. Ayush Raj, Adv. |
Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General Mr. M. K. Maroria, AOR Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv. Mr. Anuj Srinivas, Udupa, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
On the last date, a submission was made by the learned ASG that the present matter can be disposed of in light of the judgment in Afzal Ansari vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in 2003 SCC OnLine SC 1676.
The concerned judgment has since been examined by Mr. Kapil Sibal, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and he submits that the same can have no direct application in the present matter.
(DEEPAK JOSHI) (KAMLESH RAWAT) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR