Branding City Development Company Rep By Its Partner N. Srinivasan vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Its Secretary To Government Home Department

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble M.R. Shah
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:28 Nov 2019
CNR:SCIN010407272017

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Stage:

SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)

Remarks:

List On (Date) [24-02-2020]

Listed On:

28 Nov 2019

In:

Registrar

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

REGISTRAR COURT. 1
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 35505/2017

BRANDING CITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME <pre>DEPARTMENT & ORS.Respondent(s)</pre> ) WTTH SLP(C) No. 2870/2018 (XII) SLP(C) No. 37292/2017 (XII) ) SLP(C) No. 37303/2017 (XII)

SLP(C) No. 37274/2017 (XII) ) SLP(C) No. 37265/2017 (XII) ) SLP(C) No. 37267/2017 (XII) ) SLP(C) No. 37266/2017 (XII) ) SLP(C) No. 37311/2017 (XII) ) SLP(C) No. 37293/2017 (XII) ) SLP(C) No. 37312/2017 (XII) ) SLP(C) No. 37310/2017 (XII) ) SLP(C) No. 37309/2017 (XII) ) SLP(C) No. 37264/2017 (XII) ) SLP(C) No. 12538/2018 (XII) ) Signature $\mathbb{N}$ $\mathbb{P}$ $(\mathbb{C})$ No. 10980/2019 (XII) Date : 28-11-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)
              Mr Mayilsamy K, Adv.
              Mr K Muthu Ganesa Pandian, Adv.
 Mr. P. Soma Sundaram, AOR
 Mr. T. Harish Kumar, AOR
For Respondent(s)
              Ms Uma Prasuna Bachu, Adv.
 Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR
 Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR
 Mr. N. Rajaraman, AOR
              Mr Tara Chauhan, Adv.
 Mr. Krishan Kumar, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

All matters

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on the unserved respondents as mentioned in the office report within two weeks time as last opportunity.

However, ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that some of the unserved respondents are petitioners in other connected matters and are duly represented, as such, service may be deemed to be complete. Ld. Counsel has submitted a list of such respondents(enclosed). Registry to verify. If submission made by the ld. Counsel for the petitioner are correct, service is deemed to be complete on these respondents. For remaining respondents, ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps within two weeks time.

Item no.19

Ld. Counsels appearing for the duly represented respondents appearing for the first time are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit.

The ld. Counsels who are already appearing for the served respondents are granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit.

Ld. Counsel for the served respondents who were given last opportunity for filing counter affidavit and have not filed counter affidavit, their further opportunity stands declined.

List again on 24.2.2020.

ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(20) - 25 Jul 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 24 Apr 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 27 Mar 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 7 Nov 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 21 Oct 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 5 Oct 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 24 Feb 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 28 Nov 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(12) - 12 Sept 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 26 Aug 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 16 Apr 2019

ROP

Click to view

Order(9) - 11 Feb 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 8 Jan 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 29 Oct 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 31 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 13 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 7 May 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(3) - 26 Apr 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 25 Jan 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 8 Jan 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data