State Bank Of India Chariman vs. Rajendar Prashad Saini And Ors. Etc

Item No.108

$\mathbf{1}$

SECTION XVI -A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR

IA 1/2015 in Transfer Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 1904-1915/2015

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

STATE BANK OF INDIA

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SH. INDER MOHAN SHARMA AND ORS. ETC & ANR. Respondent(s)

(FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA $1/2015$ and IA No.77425/2017-SUBSTITUTED SERVICE)

WITH T.P. (C) No. $2020-2044/2015$ (XVI -A) ( FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA $1/2015$ )

T.P. (C) No. $1955-1958/2015$ (XVI -A) ( FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA $1/2015$ )

T.P. (C) No. $2008-2012/2015$ (XVI -A) ( FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA $1/2015$ )

T.P. (C) No. $1991-2006/2015$ (XVI -A) ( FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA $1/2015$ )

T.P. (C) No. $2054-2059/2015$ (XVI -A) ( FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA $1/2015$ )

T.P. (C) No. $1963-1971/2015$ (XVI -A) (These FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA $1/2015$ )

T.P. (C) No. $15-18/2016$ (XVI -A) (FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA $1/2016$ )

T.P. (C) No. $1328-1329/2017$ (XVI -A) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No. 70942/2017-STAY APPLICATION)

ignature Not Variated (C) No. $19/2016$ (XVI -A) OR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2016)

T.P. (C) No. $31-35/2016$ (XVI -A) ( FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA $1/2016$ )

Date: 22-09-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Ms. Arti Singh, AOR

Mr. Karan Govel,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kapur, AOR Ms. Priyadarshinee Singh,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Rabin Majumder, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

T.P.(C) Nos. 2020-2044/2015

I.A. for direction filed by Mr. Rabin Majumder, Ld. Counsel is defective. Ld. Counsel shall within a period of two weeks rectify the defects whatever have been found in the said application.

T.P.(C) No. 1904-1915/2015

Certificate of service on unserved respondents is awaited. Registry to issue D.O Letter urgently. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substituted service which appears to be defective. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner that in the earlier office report name of some of the respondents were given whereas in the subsequent Office Report some respondents were added. Let Counsel for the petitioner herself inspect the office record and see as to which of the respondents are yet to be served and provide details thereof by filing an annexure to the application that already been filed, the defects may also be cured in the meantime. Registry to verify the application and list before this Court on 12.10.2017.

T.P.(C) No. 1955-58/2015

Certificate of service on unserved respondents is awaited. Registry to issue D.O. letter urgently. In addition petitioner seeks and is given dasti. Registry to issue dasti notice.

List again on 12.10.2017.

SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

MG