State Bank Of India Chariman vs. Rajendar Prashad Saini And Ors. Etc

SECTION X<u>VIA</u> $22|x|16$ LISTED ON IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LD. REGISTRAR COURT: CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. $15-18$ , $19$ , $4:31-35$ TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NOS 🙌 OF 2016 State Bank of Didit. I 033. ....Pelilioner $S$ VERSUS .....Respondent Shop Konting & ER. OFFICE REPORT The Transfer Pelition above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court / Ld. Register-Court on $1/61$ , 2016 when the Court / he was granted / directed "Tag with Transfer Publican (1) Nos 1904-1915 of 2015 and connected mothers." NOT READY / FOR THE REASON: $\mathcal{F}$ . 1 Accordingly, Notice was issued to the sole Respondent through Registered A.D. $__$ as well as Dasli / through Trial Court: Post on $_$ It is submitted that unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from sole Respondent with the Postal remarks," It is submitted that neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover has been received. $3_{+}.$ back from sole respondent so far. It is submitted that A.D. Card duly signed by the sole Respondent has been $\sim$ received but no one has filed. Vakalainama and memo of appearance on his behalf. so far. 15 It is submitted that Service Report has been received from the Trial Court stating therein that $\delta$ The counsel has filed an Affidavit of service after effecting Dasti service on the Respondent No. / has not filed Affidavit of service of dash notice. It is submitted that pursuant to order protect above, $\mathcal{A}^{\mathcal{A}}$ T.P. (U MOS 15-18, 19 and 31-35 of 2016 has been tagged<br>with T.P. (1) Nos. 1904-1915 of 2015. No Notice Three of in the mallets above SERVICE OF NOTICE IS NOT COMPLETE. Mentiere The matter (s), is / are listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. Dated this the 19th day of February $-2015$ $\widehat{\mathbf{ASSISTANT}}$ Copy to: Mr. Sanjey-Kapur, Advocate $\overbrace{\mathfrak{g}}_{\mathfrak{p}}\mathfrak{g}$ Advocate