Bmm Ispat Ltd vs. The State Of Goa
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Registrar
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Listed On:
22 Apr 2024
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION III ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH
Civil Appeal No(s). 5135-5157/2013
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
Appellant(s)
VERSUS
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. ETC. Respondent $(s)$
([Only CA No. 5135-5157 of 2013, SLP Nos. 22289 & 26191 of 2023 and SLP Diary No. 22296/2024 are listed] )
WITH SLP(C) No. 22289/2023 (IX)
SLP(C) No. 26191/2023 (IX)
Diarv No(s). 22296/2024 (IX)
Date: 12-11-2024 These appeals were called on for hearing today.
For Appellant(s)
Mr. Dhananjaya Mishra, AOR Mr. Navneet Dogra, Adv. Mr. Guruprasad Naik, Av. Mr. Gajendra Singh Negi, Adv. Mr. Dcosta Ivo Manuel Simon, AOR Mr. K. V. Vijayakumar, AOR Mr. K.v. Sriwas Narayanan, Adv. Mr. K.v. Vibu Prasad, Adv.
Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR Ms. Priyal Sheth, Adv.
Mr. Abhay Anil Anturkar, Adv.
Mr. Dhruv Tank, Adv.
Mr. Aniruddha Awalgaonkar, Adv. Ms. Surbhi Kapoor, AOR Mr. Bhagwant Deshpande, Adv. Ms. Subhi Pastor, Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR Ms. Nandita Chauhan, Adv. Ms. Tijil Thakur, Adv. Mr. K. R. Sasiprabhu, AOR Mr. Vishnu Sharma A S, Adv. Mr. Prakhar Agarwal, Adv. Mr. O. P. Gaggar, AOR Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, AOR Mr. Pawan R Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Sarvjit Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Anuj Jain, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Gupta, AOR Ms. Megha Goswami, Adv. Ms. Mamta Sharma, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
C.A. No. 5135-5157/2013
All the respondents are duly served/represented.
The matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
SLP(C) No. 22289/2023
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have failed to file the counter affidavit despite last opportunity. Further opportunity to file the counter affidavit is declined.
Service of notice is complete on respondent No. 3 but no one
has entered appearance on his behalf.
Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to issue notice to respondent No. 4. As prayed, dasti in addition is permitted to be served.
Let the affidavit of dasti service be filed within a period of four weeks.
List again on 28.3.2025.
SLP(C) No. 26191/2023
Four weeks time, is granted to respondent Nos. 1 to 3, to file the counter affidavit.
List again on 28.3.2025.
SLP(C) D.No. 22296/2024
Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
However Mr. Anirudh Kumar, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Ms. Surbhi Kapoor, Ld. Advocate-on-Record for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
He seeks and is granted four weeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit.
List again on 28.3.2025.
SUJATA SINGH Registrar
MG