P. Nagesh Kumar vs. Panguluru Seethammagari A. V. Dh. Sath. Rep. By The Chairman Of The Board Of Trust Of Sri Kanyakaparameswari Devasthanams P. Gopinath
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2
LISTED ON: 04-03-2016 ITEM NO: 25
SECTION XII A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 22888 OF 2014 WITH
PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
P. NAGESH KUMAR & ANR. ...PETITIONERS
VERSUS
PANGULURU S. A.V.D. SATHRAM. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS
OFFICE REPORT
The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 20th January, 2016, when the following order was passed:
"Respondent No.7 has already filed the counter affidavit.
The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.
Four weeks time is given to the respondent No.3 to file the counter affidavit.
Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 and 8 to 12 have been deleted by order dated 24.4.2015 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber.
Four weeks time is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners for filing the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to the respondent No. 2. List again on 4.3.2016. "
It is submitted that Counsel for the Respondent No. 3 has not filed counter affidavit so far.
It is further submitted that reminder letter was issued to Trial Court on 1 st December, 2015 with request to submit service report in respect of Respondent No. 2 . Service report from Trial Court has been received on 20th January, 2016 with remarks Respondent No. 2 "Served".
It is also submitted that there are 12 respondents in the matter. M/s. Lawyer's Knit & Co, Advocates have filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent no. 7 and also filed counter affidavit. Name of Respondent nos. 4 to 6 and 8 to 12 have been deleted vide Chamber Judge order dated 24th April, 2015.
Service is Complete.
It is lastly submitted that M/s. Lawyer's Knit & Co., Advocates have on 18th August, 2015 filed application for Impleadment to implead the party as Respondent. But the said application is defective as Counsel has not served its copy on other side Advocate, Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 despite this Registry's letter dated 9.09.2015.
The aforesaid matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report.
Dated this, the 3rd day of March, 2016
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to:
-
- Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Advocate
- 116, Lawyers Chamber
-
- M/s. Lawyers Knit & Co., Advocate 20, Old Lawyers Chambers
-
- Mr. Himanshu Munshi, Advocate
-
- Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Advocate
- *5. Mr. C.S.N Mohan Rao, Advocate
*(With Reference to vakalatnama/appearance filed by you on 1.12.2015 in the matter above-mentioned . I am to inform you that the name of executant of vakalatnama is not clear. You are therefore, requested to clarify the same forthwith)