P. Nagesh Kumar vs. Panguluru Seethammagari A. V. Dh. Sath. Rep. By The Chairman Of The Board Of Trust Of Sri Kanyakaparameswari Devasthanams P. Gopinath
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Item No.25
REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XITA
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 22888/2014 P.NAGESH KR.& ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
PANGULURU S.A.V.D.SATHRAM & ORS.
Respondent(s)
<pre>(with office report)</pre>Date : $04/03/2016$ This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manish Garani, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Munshi, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv.
Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Adv.
Mr.Abhishek Singh, Adv. M/s. Lawyer S Knit & Co, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
Respondent No.7 has already filed the counter affidavit.
The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.2 but no one has $\frac{\text{data}}{\text{state}}$
Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No.3 to file the counter affidavit.
The office report indicates that I.A. for impleadment filed by
Item No.25 2
M/s Lawyers S. Knit and Co., Advocates is defective. The learned counsel shall within a period of four weeks rectify the defects whatever have been found in the said application.
List again on 27.4.2016.
(M V RAMESH) Registrar
MG