Thirukurunkudi Jeeyar Mutt Through Its Jeeyer Swamigal vs. Sundara Subramanian (Dead) (For Themselves And As Representatives Of Saivaites)& Ors.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
äITEM NO. 24 & 54 COURT NO.5 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos.36496-36498/2010 (From the judgement and order dated 29/11/2010 in SA No. 176/2010 & SA No. 646/2010 & SA No. 1075/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF MADRAS) THIRUKURUNKUDI JEEYAR MUTT THR.JEEYER Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNDARA SUBRAMANIAN FOR THEMSELVES Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NOs. 298-300 OF 2011 (with appln. for exemption from filing O.T. and exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 10/01/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU For Petitioner(s) SLP 36496-36498/2010 Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. P.B. Suresh, Adv. Mr. Vipin Nair, Adv. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv. M/S. Temple Law Firm,Adv. SLP 298-300/2011 Mr. K.V. Viswanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. P.B. Suresh, Adv. Mr. Vipin Nair, Adv. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv. M/s Temple Law Firm, Adv. For Respondent(s) rr 2 & 3 in SLP 36496-36498/2010 Mr. R. Nedumaran, Adv. ...2/- :2: UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. In the meantime, status quo with regard to the shifting of idol, as it exists today, shall be maintained.
(VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master