Maharashtra State Elect. Dist. Company Ltd vs. Chetan S/O Narayan Mohokar

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.13 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 21679/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/07/2014 in WP No. 2522/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Nagpur) MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECT. DIST. COMPANY LTD. AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHETAN S/O NARAYAN MOHOKAR AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 07/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. A. S. Bhasme,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Learned counsel for the Petitioners vehemently contends that this Court as well as the several decisions of the High Courts have underscored the legal position that Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Usha Rani Bhardwaj Date: 2015.01.08 17:00:47 IST Reason: Courts should not interfere in orders of transfers, specially where the appointment itself makes the job a transferable one. It is also stated that no malafides are 2 alleged by the Petitioners before the High Court, and his case was predicated only on the need to remain in his present position so as to enable his daughter to finish her 10th examination.

$ 1

In the present case the High Court has restricted the relief to 30th April 2015. It is only for that reason we do not want to interfere the Impugned Order. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed.

(NEELAM GULATI) (SAROJ SAINI) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER