Union Of India vs. Jbm Ecolife Mobility Private Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble A.S. Bopanna, Hon'ble J.B. Pardiwala
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [4]
Listed On:
14 Mar 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
195966/2022,195968/2022,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 23027-23028/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-10-2022 in LPA No. 327/2022 and in LPA No. 500/2022 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)
UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M/S JBM ECOLIFE MOBILITY PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 195966/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT (IA No. 195968/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 04-01-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR<br>Mr. N Venkataraman, A.S.G.<br>Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Adv.<br>Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv.<br>Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv.<br>Ms. Bani Dikshit, Adv. |
---|---|
For Respondent(s) | Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya, Asdv.<br>Mr. Kunal Vajani, Adv.<br>Mr. Debanjan Mandal, Adv.<br>Mr. Kunal Mimani, AOR<br>Mr. Debayan Sen, Adv.<br>Mr. Shubhang Tandon, Adv.<br>Ms. Shraddha Chirania, Adv.<br>Mr. Sivagnanam K, Adv.<br>Mr. Harsh Nadda, Adv. |
Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Sr. Adv. Ms. Nandini Gore, Adv. Ms. Aditi Bhatt, Adv. Mr. Sarthak Gaur, Adv. Mr. Yash Dubey, Adv. Ms. Manvi Rastogi, Adv. Ms. Pracheta Kar, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sidhra, Adv. Mr. Nadeem Afroz, Adv. M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Issue notice to the respondents.
Since the respondents are stated to have entered caveat, issue of formal issue is dispensed.
Objections, if any, be filed in two weeks.
Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 4 undertakes that the contempt proceedings will not be precipitated in the meanwhile.
(NISHA KHULBEY) (DIPTI KHURANA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR