Moola Ram vs. The State Of Rajasthan
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XV
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 30990/2018
MOOLA RAM & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. $Respondent(s)$ WITH SLP(C) No. $1545/2019$ (XV) (IA No.101223/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Date: 09-05-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR Mr. Devesh Kumar Agnihotri, Adv. Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, AOR Mr. Apoorv Kurup, AOR Mr. Anish Maheshwari, Adv. Samir Malik, AOR Mr. Kumar Prashant, Adv.
Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, AOR
Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER SLP(C) No. $30990/2018$
Respondent Nos.1 and 4 have already filed counter affidavit.
Respondent No.2 has not filed counter affidavit, despite last opportunity. Further opportunity is declined.
Service is complete on respondent No.3 but none has
entered appearance. 🎇 (ⓒ) No. 1545/2019
Respondent No.1 has not filed counter affidavit, despite last opportunity. Further opportunity is declined.
None appeared for respondent No.2 when called.
As per office report, Ld. Counsel for respondent No.2 has not filed counter affidavit, despite one opportunity having been granted. There is neither any application in terms of Order V Rule 1(22), Supreme Court Rules, 2013 nor is there any oral request for extension of time to file counter affidavit, hence, opportunity to file counter affidavit stands declined.
Respondent No.3 has already filed counter affidavit.
Registry to process both the matters for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar