Gazala Rashid vs. The State Of Jammu And Kashmir Chief Secretary

\224ITEM NO.59 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33190-33193/2015 GAZALA RASHID AND ORS ETC ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS ETC ETC Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for effecting substituted service and office report) Date : 27/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora,Adv. Mr Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sunil Fernandes,Adv. Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO.33190/2015 Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 6 and 40 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Respondent Nos. 42 to 46, 50 and 51 have already filed counter affidavit Respondent nos. 38,39,48,49 and 54 to 59 have already been deleted from the array of parties vide order dt.23.8.2016. -2- Item No.59 Application for substituted service of respondent nos. 7 to 15, 17-19, 22,23,25,27-32 and 35-37 is allowed. Notices be accordingly issued to be published in the newspapers as mentioned in the application. None appears for respondent nos. 20,21,24,26,34,41,47,52 and 53 despite due service. Status of respondent Nos. 16,33 and 40 be mentioned in the next office report. SLP(C) NO.33191/2015 Opportunity to respondent nos. 1-4 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Respondent nos. 5 to 8 have already been deleted from the array of parties vide order dt.23.8.2016. Matter falls under complete category. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters. SLP(C) NO.33192/2015 None appears for respondent nos. 16,20,21,24,26,33,34,40,41,45 and 46 despite due service. Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 6, 40, 43,44 and 54 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Respondent nos. 38,39,42,47-53 and 60 have already been deleted from the array of parties vide order dt.23.8.2016. Application for substituted service of respondent nos. 7 to 15, 17 to 19, 22,23,25,27 to 32 and 35 to 37 is allowed. Notices be accordingly issued to be published in the newspapers as mentioned in the application. -3- Item No.59 SLP(C) NO.33193/2015 None appears for respondent nos. 21,24,26,34,41,47,86,97

and 99 despite due service. Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 6 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Respondent nos. 107 to 110 have already been deleted

from the array of parties vide order dt.23.8.2016. Application for substituted service of respondent nos. 7 to 15, 17 to 19, 22,23,25,27 to 32,35 to 40,42 to 46, 48 to 85, 87 to 96, 98 and 100 to 106 is allowed. Notices be accordingly issued to be published in the newspapers as mentioned in the application. Status of respondent no.16,20,33 be mentioned in the next office report. List again on 3.1.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL)

Registrar