Gazala Rashid vs. The State Of Jammu And Kashmir Chief Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LISTED ON : 22-04-2016 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REGISTRAR COURT NO. : 1
SECTION XVI-A ITEM No. :91
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) Nos. 33190-33193 of 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
GAZALA RASHID & ORS.ETC.ETC. ....Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS. ETC.ETC. .....Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
The Special Leave Petitions above-mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on
09-02-2016, when he was pleased to pass the following Order:-
"SLP(C) No.33190/2015
Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent Nos.1 to 6 and 40 for filing counter affidavit.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent Nos.42 to 46, 50 and 51 submits that she has already filed counter affidavit. Registry to verify and submit report.
Nobody appears for respondent Nos.16, 20, 21, 24, 26, 34, 41, 47, 52 and 53 despite due service.
Fresh steps to be taken for service of the unserved respondents within three weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.
SLP(C) No.33191/2015
Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent Nos.1 to 4 for filing counter affidavit.
Fresh steps to be taken for service of the unserved respondents within three weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.
SLP(C) No.33192/2015
Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent Nos.1 to 6, 40, 43, 44 and 54 to 59 for filing counter affidavit.
Nobody appears for respondent Nos.16, 20, 21, 24, 26, 33, 34, 40, 41, 45 and 46, despite due service.
Fresh steps to be taken for service of the unserved respondents within three weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.
-2- SLP(C) No.33193/2015 Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent Nos.1 to 6 for filing counter affidavit. Nobody appears for respondent Nos.20, 21, 24, 26, 34, 41, 47, 86, 97 and 99, despite due service. Fresh steps to be taken for service of the unserved respondents within three weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 22.4.2016."
It is submitted that the special leave petition was registered with 4 numbers. The service position in the matters is as follows:-
S.No. | Remarks | |
---|---|---|
1. | SLP (c) No. 33190 of 2015 | There are 59 Respondents.<br>It is submitted that counsel for the<br>Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 & 40 has not filed<br>Counter Affidvit so far. |
It is further submitted that counsel for the<br>respondent Nos. 42 to 46, 50 & 51 has not<br>04-09-2015 filed Counter Affidavit on their<br>behalf but has not served the copy of the<br>same to the counsel for respondent Nos. 1<br>to 6 so far despite this registry's Letter dated<br>08-09-2015. | ||
It is also submitted that the counsel for the<br>petitioner has not taken fresh steps for<br>service of notice on unserved respondent<br>hence fresh notice could not be issued. | ||
It is submitted that the counsel for<br>respondent Nos. 42 to 46, 50 & 51 has not<br>filed proof of service on counsel for<br>petitioner so far. | ||
It is lastly submitted that the counsel for the<br>petitioner has on 08-04-2016 filed two<br>applications:- | ||
(a) For deletion of respondent Nos. 38, 39,<br>48 to 49, 54 to 59 from array of parties<br>which is to be registered & placed before the<br>Ho'ble Judge in Chamber. | ||
Contd3/- |
-3- | (b) For subsituted service through<br>publication on respondent Nos. 7 to 15, 17<br>to 19, 22 to 23, 25, 27 to 32 & 35 to 37<br>which is defective & a letter in this regard<br>has been issued to the counsel on<br>13-04-2016.<br>Service of notice is not complete on<br>Respondent Nos. 7 to 15, 17 to 19, 22, 23,<br>25, 27 to 3, 35 to 39, 48 to 49, 54 to 59. | |
---|---|---|
2. | SLP (c) No. 33191 of 2015 | There are 8 Respondents.<br>It is submitted that the counsel for<br>respondent nos. 1 to 4 has not filed Counter<br>Affidavit so far.<br>It is further submitted that the counsel for the<br>petitioner has not taken fresh steps for<br>service of notice on unserved respondent<br>hence fresh notice could not be issued.<br>It is also submitted that the counsel for the<br>petitioner has on 08-04-2016 filed an<br>application for deletion of unserved<br>respondent Nos. 5 to 8 which is to be<br>registered and place before the Hon'ble<br>Judge in Chamber.<br>Service of notice is not complete on<br>Respondent Nos. 5 to 8. |
3. | SLP (c) No. 33192 of 2015 | There are 60 Respondents.<br>It is submitted that the counsel for the<br>Respondent Nos. 1 to 6, 40, 43, 44 & 54 to<br>59 has not filed Counter Affidavit so far.<br>It is further submitted that service of notice is<br>complete on Respondent Nos. 16, 20, 21,<br>21, 24, 26, 33, 34, 40, 41, 45 & 46 but no<br>one has put appearance on their behalf so<br>far.<br>It is also submitted that the counsel for the<br>petitioner has not taken fresh steps for<br>service of notice on unserved respondent<br>hence fresh notice could not be issued.<br>Contd4/- |
-4- | ||
---|---|---|
It is submitted that the counsel for<br>respondent Nos. 42 to 46, 50 & 51 has not<br>filed proof of service on counsel for<br>petitioner so far. | ||
It is lastly submitted that the counsel for the<br>petitioner has on 08-04-2016 filed two<br>applications:- | ||
(a) For deletion of respondent Nos. 38 to 39,<br>42, 47 to 53 & 60 from array of parties which<br>is to be registered & placed before the<br>Ho'ble Judge in Chamber. | ||
(b) For subsituted service through<br>publication on respondent Nos. 7 to 15, 17<br>to 19, 22 to 23, 25, 27 to 32 & 35 to 37<br>which is defective & a letter in this regard<br>has been issued to the counsel on<br>13-04-2016 | ||
Service of notice is not complete on<br>Respondent Nos. 7 to 15, 17 to 19,<br>22,23,25,27 to 32, 35 to 39, 42, 47 to 53, &<br>60. | ||
4. | SLP (c) No. 33193 of 2015 | There are 110 Respondents. |
It is submitted that the counsel for the<br>Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 has not filed<br>Counter Affidavit so far. | ||
It is further submitted that service of notice is<br>complete on Respondent Nos. 21, 24, 26,<br>34, 41, 47. 86, 97 & 99 but no one has put<br>appearance on their behalf so far. | ||
It is also submitted that the counsel for the<br>petitioner has not taken fresh steps for<br>service of notice on unserved respondent<br>hence fresh notice could not be issued. | ||
It is lastly submitted that the counsel for the<br>petitioner has on 08-04-2016 filed two<br>applications:- | ||
(a) For deletion of respondent Nos. 107-110<br>from array of parties which is to be<br>registered & placed before the Ho'ble Judge<br>in Chamber. | ||
Contd5/- |
-5-<br>(b) For subsituted service through<br>publication on respondent Nos. 7 to 15, 17<br>to 19, 22 to 23, 25, 27 to 32 & 35 to 40, 42<br>to 46, 47 to 85 , 87to 96, 99, 100 to 106<br>which is defective & a letter in this regard<br>has been issued to the counsel on<br>13-04-2016 |
---|
Service of notice is not complete on<br>Respondent Nos. 7 to 15, 17 to 19,<br>22,23,25,27 to 33, 35 to 40, 42 to 46, 48 to<br>85, 87 to 96, 98, 100 to 110. |
The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this Report.
Dated this the 21st day of April, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to : Mr. Jyoti Mendiratta, Advocate Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, Advocate Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Advocate
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR