Lokniti Foundation Secretary vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Home Affairs Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
16 Dec 2010
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
1
ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.9 SECTION PIL(W)
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 317/2013 SARFRAJ MULLA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 26/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv. Mr. Divya Joyti Jaipuriar, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Shreeji Bhavsar, Adv. For Respondent(s) R-1, UOI Ms. V. Mohana, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sudhir Walia, Adv. Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. Himachal Pradesh Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Sr. AAG Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv. Haryana Mr. Anil Grover, AAG Ms. Noopur Singhal, Adv. Mr. Ajay Choudhary,Adv. Manipur Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv. Ms. Lingthoingambi Thongam, Adv. Mr. Z.H. Issac Haiding, Adv. Digitally signed by VINOD KUMAR Date: 2016.02.27 10:09:17 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
| Ms. B. Khushbansi, Adv.<br>Mr. S.Vijayananda Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv. | |
|---|---|
| Mr. Balaji Srinivasan,Adv. | |
| R-2 | Mr. B. Balaji,Adv.<br>Mr. Muthuvel Palani, Adv. |
| Andhra Pradesh | Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Adv.<br>Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. |
| J&K | Mr. G.M. Kawoosa, Adv.<br>Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv. |
| Telangana | Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv.<br>Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, Adv. |
| Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. | |
| Chhattisgarh | Mr. Jogesh Kumar Gilda, AG<br>Mr. C. D. Singh,AAG<br>Mr. Udit A., Adv. |
| Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. | |
| Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. | |
| Tripura | Mr. Gopal Singh,Adv.<br>Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Adv.<br>Ms. Varsha Poddar, Adv. |
| Mr. M. T. George,Adv. | |
| Mizoram | Mr. T.L.V. Ramachari, Adv.<br>Mr. K.V.L. Raghavn, Adv.<br>Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. Shikhar Garg, Adv.<br>Mr. Pragyan Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran,Adv. |
| Uttarakhand | Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv.<br>Md. Naseem Mughal, Adv.<br>Mr. Manish Kumar Vikkey, Adv. |
2
| U.P. | Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,Adv.<br>Ms. Soumya Kumar, Adv. |
|---|---|
| Nagaland | Mrs. K. Enatoli Sema, Adv.<br>Mr. Edward Belho, Adv.<br>Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv. |
| Mr. Samir Ali Khan,Adv. | |
| Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. | |
| Jharkhand | Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh,Adv.<br>Mohd. Waquas, Adv. |
| Mr. V. N. Raghupathy,Adv. | |
| Sikkim | Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv.<br>Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv.<br>Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Adv.<br>Mr. Yusuf Khan, Adv.<br>Mr. Shobhit Nanda, Adv.<br>For M/s Arputham<br>Aruna & Co. |
| Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. | |
| M/s Corporate Law Group,Adv. | |
| Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv.<br>Ms. Jesal Wahi, Adv.<br>Ms. Vinakshi Kadan, Adv.<br>Ms. Nigar Khan, Adv. | |
| Goa | Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Adv.<br>Ms. Surekha Raman, Adv.<br>Mr. Purushottam Kumar Jha, Adv.<br>Ms. Niharika, Adv.<br>Mr. Anuj Sarma, Adv.<br>For M/s. K. J. John & Co. |
| Odisha | Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Adv.<br>Mr. Sarvjit Pratap Singh, Adv.<br>Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. |
| Rajasthan | Mr. Rohit K. Singh, Adv. |
3
R-16 Mr. Barun Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Nishant Katneshwarkar, Adv. Arunachal Pradesh Mr. Anil Shrivastav, Adv.
Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard Mr. Colin Gonsalves, learned senior counsel for the petitioners. He is directed to assist this Court with regard to the effect of the directions earlier issued by this Court and to comply with the directions consequent upon which, it is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the different States/Union Territories, some enactments were made by different States/Union Territories and further to assist us as to the legal effect of the aforesaid enactments, which are the subject matter of litigation before this Court in a public interest litigation, as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the different States/Union Territories. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners is also directed to file a detailed affidavit pointing out specifically with regard to the compliance of earlier directions of this
4
Court by the respective States/Union Territories and make specific averments as to the deficiencies, if any, in the compliance.
States/Union Territories, which have not complied with the earlier directions are directed to file affidavit/better affidavit either through Principal Secretary to the Home Department or the Chief Secretary within two weeks.
List the matter after two weeks.
(VINOD KUMAR) COURT MASTER
(MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER