S. Neelaveni vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Dipankar Datta, Hon'ble R. Mahadevan
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed on ground of delay
Listed On:
20 Sept 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT NO.16
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 39976/2024
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-11-2015 in WP No. 4827/2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras)
S. NEELAVENI
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
(IA No.209210/2024-CONDONATION DELAY $\overline{0}$ F ${\tt IN}$ FILING and $IA$ No.209211/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.209212/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date: 20-09-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.
- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
- For Petitioner(s) Mrs. N S Nappinai, Sr. Adv.
- Mr. R Dhinesh Kumar, Adv.
- Mr. K Rajan, Adv.
- Mr. Ikshit Singhal, Adv.
- Mr. Subodh, Adv.
- Mr. Jeetendra Kumar, Adv.
- Mrs. Kajal Rani, Adv.
- Mr. Cm Dwivedi, Adv.
- Mr. Narendra Kumar Goyal, Adv.
- Mr. K Venkateshwara Prasad, Adv.
- Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
- M/S. Mukesh Kumar Singh And Co., AOR
- Mr. R Dhinesh Kumar, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
$1.$ The cause shown for condonation of delay is not sufficient. The application
for condonation of delay stands rejected.
$\mathcal{L}$ Consequently, the special leave petition is dismissed on the ground of
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(JATINDER KAUR) P.S. to REGISTRAR (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA) COURT MASTER (NSH)