Bindu Gulab Yadav vs. The State Of Bihar

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).21208-21209/2024

COURT NO.3

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-06-2021 in LPA No.113/2020 16-05-2024 in LPA No.125/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patnal

BINDU GULAB YADAV & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

Respondent $(s)$

VERSUS

THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

(IA No. 213106/2024 - EX-PARTE STAY, IA No. 204087/2024 - EX-PARTE STAY, IA No. 213107/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.204088/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 200870/2024 -EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 226579/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA NO. 226578/2024 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION)

WITH

Diary No(s).46155/2024 (XVI)

(IA No. 232369/2024 - CONDONATION $\mathsf{OF}$ DELAY IN FILING, $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.232370/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING $C/C$ OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 232371/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.232368/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..))

Date: 26-11-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh Singh Chauhan, AOR

Mr. Raja Choudhary, Adv.

• Mr. Jatin Bhardwaj, Adv.
• Mr. Sanyam Jain, Adv.
• Mr. Japdeep Singh Chahal, Adv., Adv.

Mr. Navaniti Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv.

• Mr. Vaibhav Niti, AOR

• Ms. Madhavi Agrawal, Adv.

• Mr. Vijayraj Singh Chouhan, Adv.

• Mr. Jairaj Singh, Adv.

• Mr. Divyanshu Agrawal, Adv.

• <pre>Mr. Vedant Singh, AOR</pre>
  • Mr. Anshul Narayan, Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash, AOR
  • Mr. Smarhar Singh, AOR
  • Ms. Shweta Kumari, Adv.

Mr. Pankaj Prakash, Adv. Mr. Vikas Chopra, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. Ms. Kumud Lata Das, AOR Ms. Pooja Rathore, Adv. Mr. Aman Anand, Adv. Mr. Bibhuti Krishna, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) No.21208-21209/2024

1. List on 10.12.2024 (NMD).

Diary No.46155/2024

2. Permission to file special leave petitions is granted.

3. Delay condoned.

4. The petitioners have not approached this Court with clean hands. The factum that CWJC No.15689/2024, challenging the second No-Confidence Motion, was filed in the High Court and a consent order has been passed in that writ petition on 08.10.2024, where the parties agreed to conduct a fresh meeting under the old No-Confidence Motion, has been conveniently concealed in the instant petitions.

5. The instant special leave petitions, therefore, is liable to be dismissed on the ground of concealment of material facts. Ordered accordingly.

6. The special leave petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.

7. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

(ARJUN BISHT) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR