Mandir Shri Purnasar Hanumanji Pujari Trust And Anr. Through Its Secretary Mahavir S/O. Shri Hanuman Mal By Caste Bothraoswal Aged 43 Years vs. Murti Shri Punrasar Hanumanji
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Listed On:
27 Apr 2018
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
3/2011,5/2011,7/2016,8/2016,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 2
SECTION XV
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR
IA $3/2011, 5/2011, 7/2016, 8/2016$ , in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6643-6644/2010
MANDIR SHRI PURNASAR HANUMANJI PUJARI TRUST AND ANR. & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
MURTI SHRI PUNRASAR HANUMANJI AND ORS & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION [I.A. Nos. 3-4] FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. [I.A. Nos. 5-6] FOR [APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS (I.A. NOS. 7-8)] FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. [I.A. NOS. 9-10]
Date: 27-04-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Ms. Hemantika Wahi, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Ms. Pratibha Jain, AOR
Mr. H.D. Thanvi, Adv.
Ms. Ishita Jakhmola, Adv. Mr. Rishi Matoliya, Adv.
Mr. H.D. Thanvi, Adv. Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, AOR
Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, AOR Ms. Shikha Sandhu, Adv.
Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
Ld. Counsel for the petitioners has failed to file the fresh particulars and to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the respondent Nos. 26(b) to 26(d), 30(a), 30(b), 31,32 and 35 to ature Not Verifie $\mathcal{L}$ despite opportunities. Viewed in that context, the matter shall $\frac{16.37455}{\text{Res}}$ processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders. List thereafter.
SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar
$MC$