Director Of Animal Husbandry vs. Dr. Arpana Kakati Rao
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
22 Nov 2018
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.3 SECTION XII-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 39705/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-11-2017 in WP No. 16375/2017 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad For The State Of Telangana And The State Of Andhra Pradesh)
DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
DR. ARPANA KAKATI RAO Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.163464/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.163466/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT )
Date : 22-11-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Prerna Singh,Adv. For Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Delay condoned.
It is seen that Respondent No.1 was an applicant before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.1009/2017 seeking consideration of her appointment as Assistant Engineer Veterinary Surgeon. On 19.04.2017, the Tribunal passed the following order:-
"Admit. Notices to the respondents returnable in six weeks.
Future appointments to be made in Zone-I under O.C. cateogry will be subject to final result of this Original Application." Digitally signed by NARENDRA PRASAD Date: 2018.11.24 13:11:02 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
1
It appears, Respondent No.1 challenged the interim order in Writ Petition and the High Court allowed it with a direction to consider the case of Respondent No.1 for appointment under 30% quota reserved for non-locals. Non-locals has been defined in the Presidential Order dated 18.10.1975.
Having gone through the order, we are, prima facie, of the view that Respondent No.1 may not come under the non-locals quota as well.
Issue notice.
Until further orders, there will be stay of operation and implementation of the impugned order of the High Court.
COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
(NARENDRA PRASAD) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)