Director Of Animal Husbandry vs. Dr. Arpana Kakati Rao

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Registrar (J) - Ii
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:22 Nov 2018
CNR:SCIN010397052018

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

First Hearing

Listed On:

22 Nov 2018

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.3 SECTION XII-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 39705/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-11-2017 in WP No. 16375/2017 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad For The State Of Telangana And The State Of Andhra Pradesh)

DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

DR. ARPANA KAKATI RAO Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.163464/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.163466/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT )

Date : 22-11-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

For Petitioner(s) Ms. Prerna Singh,Adv. For Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Delay condoned.

It is seen that Respondent No.1 was an applicant before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.1009/2017 seeking consideration of her appointment as Assistant Engineer Veterinary Surgeon. On 19.04.2017, the Tribunal passed the following order:-

"Admit. Notices to the respondents returnable in six weeks.

Future appointments to be made in Zone-I under O.C. cateogry will be subject to final result of this Original Application." Digitally signed by NARENDRA PRASAD Date: 2018.11.24 13:11:02 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

1

It appears, Respondent No.1 challenged the interim order in Writ Petition and the High Court allowed it with a direction to consider the case of Respondent No.1 for appointment under 30% quota reserved for non-locals. Non-locals has been defined in the Presidential Order dated 18.10.1975.

Having gone through the order, we are, prima facie, of the view that Respondent No.1 may not come under the non-locals quota as well.

Issue notice.

Until further orders, there will be stay of operation and implementation of the impugned order of the High Court.

COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

(NARENDRA PRASAD) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(18) - 21 Oct 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 23 Jul 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 9 Apr 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 5 Mar 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 6 Feb 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 5 Dec 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 7 Nov 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 10 Oct 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 5 Sept 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 2 Sept 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 20 Jul 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 23 Jan 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 15 Nov 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 23 Aug 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 25 Feb 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 15 Jan 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 11 Dec 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 22 Nov 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing