The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal Secretary Revenue Department vs. Sumer Singh

ITEM NO.18 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 365-366/2016 STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUMER SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 16/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Bansal,Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashish Kumar Singha,Adv. Mr. Apoorv Kurup,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.3 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1,2 and 4 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. As per tracking report notice issued to the respondent No.5 has been received back with postal remarks ⬠SInsufficient Address⬠\235. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioners shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the said respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. List again on 3.4.2017 . (M V RAMESH)

Registrar

MG