Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (Gmada) vs. Charan Singh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Text
SECTION IV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9892-9926 OF 2014
Jagtar Singh & Ors. etc. etc. ...Appellants
-VERSUS-
State of Punjab & Anr. ..Respondents
OFFICE REPORT ON PRE-FINALHEARING
Office Report is prepared as per Circular No.F.41/Judl./2008 dated 17th December, 2008:-
- (a) There are two Respondents in the Appeals. Respondent No. 2 is represented by Mrs. Rachana Joshi Issar, Advocate. Respondent No. 1 has been served with Notice at SLP stage but has not chosen to enter appearance.
- (b) Original Record has not been requisitioned from the High Court.
- (c) Not applicable.
- (d) Not applicable.
- (e) No application for substitution is pending.
- (f). The matters were placed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 3rd September, 2015, when the following order was passed:-
"Among two common respondents herein, respondent No. 2 is already represented. Respondent No. 1 till date has not entered appearance, though was served at SLP stage itself. However, as on date the Ld. Advocate, Mr. R.K. Pandey, appearing on behalf of Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate-on-Record has appeared on its behalf. Time is requested for filing Vakalatnama. Be filed within four weeks. Statement of case, it any, be also filed within the time stipulated. List again on 23.11.2015."
It is submitted that Mr. R.K. Pandey, appearing on behalf of Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate on record for Respondent No. 1 has not filed Vakalatnama/appearance till date.
Neither Counsel for Appellant nor Counsel for the Respondents in the appeal have filed Statement of case. In terms of Rule 32, Sub Rule-2 of S.C.R. 2013, it is presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of
presentation of petition for seeking special leave to appeal statement of case. If the Respondent has not filed statement of case within the stipulated time as provided in Sub Rule-1 of S.C.R. 2013, it is presumed that the respondent does not desire to lodge statement of case in the appeal.
(g) Not applicable.
Dated this the 20th day of November, 2015.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to:
-
- Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Advocate 294, Gujranwala Town, Part 3, Delhi -09
-
- Mrs. Rachana Joshi Issar, Advocate 315, Block II , Lawyers Chambers, Supreme Court, Tilak Lane, New Delhi.
3. Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate 312, M.C. Setalvad, Lawyers Chambers, SCI, New Delhi.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
suantak/c-2
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order