Thotakura Suhasini vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal Secretary Revenue (Registration) Department

(Supplementary List) LISTED ON : 05.05.2017 COURT NO.: ITEM NO. :

SECTION XII-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1/2017 in BOTH MATTERS (Application for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.../2017 in BOTH MATTERS (Application exemption from filing the certified copy of the Impugned order) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.../2017 in BOTH MATTERS (Application for exemption from filing official Translation) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.../2017 in BOTH MATTERS (Application for permission to bring on record additional documents) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.../2017 in BOTH MATTERS (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(C) ...CC NO. 9470 and 9472 of 2017 WITH

PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF

K. PERUMAL ETC ...PETITIONER

-VERSUS-

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS ETC. ...RESPONDENTS

OFFICE REPORT

The Special Leave Petitions above mentioned have been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 23rd December, 2015 of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Appeal No. 343 of 2015.

It is submitted to the Hon'ble Court that there is delay of 403 days in filing the Special Leave Petitions and counsel for the Petitioner has also filed application for condonation of delay in filing Special Leave Petition in both the matters.

It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed a letter annexed at page no. 173 of paper books stating therein that the order dated 05.08.2015 mentioned in the Impugned judgment is not a necessary document since it is a reference order simplicitor which referred the matter to the full bench of the High Court. Moreover, the same has been extracted by the full bench of the High Court in the impugned order itself. Judgments mentioned in para 5 of the impugned order are not necessary documents for the adjudication of this Special Leave Petition since the said facts and order of each of them has been extracted and discussed at length in the impugned order. Moreover, the said orders are not superseded by the impugned order. Moreover the letter dated 05.07.2016 and 31.03.2017 are not necessary. Therefore, He requested to ignore the defects mentioned above and process the same as soon as possible. (A copy of letter annexed at Page No. 173 of paper books and also enclosed herewith)

It is further submitted that SLP(C)..CC No. 9309 of 2017 arising out of same judgment is listed before the Hon'ble Court on 05.05.2017. (Court No. 07, Item No. 23).

The aforesaid matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this, the 04th day of May, 2017.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to :

Mr. Sridhar Potaraju, Advocate D-305, 2nd Floor, Defence Colony, Delhi-110023

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR