Union Of India Through The Secretary Govt Of India Ministry Of Finance Department Of Expenditure& Ors. vs. Vinit Jain& Ors.

TTEM $NO.3$ COURT NO. $5$ SECTION XVI SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). $5103/2016$ (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/10/2015 in CWP No. 6969/2015 passed by the High Court Of Patna) UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS SIDHARTHA SHANKER ROY AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing $c/c$ of <pre>the impugned judgment)</pre> WITH SLP(C) No. $34733/2015$ (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. $36405/2015$ (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. $237/2016$ (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Office Report) SLP(C) No. $6012/2016$ (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 9986/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6463/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for <pre>c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)</pre> SLP(C) No. $14940/2016$ (With Office Report) Civil Appeal No. 362/2016 $SLP(C)$ No. 6082/2016 🂏 🐿 Appeal No. 2790/2016

Date: 05/09/2016 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar, SG Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv. Mr. Rajat Singh, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ananya Mishra, Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria,Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Guru Krishnakumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. C. K. Rai,Adv. Mr. Paramhans, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Civil Appeal No. 362/2016, SLP(C) No. 6082/2016 and Civil Appeal No. 2790/2016 are taken on board.

All the matters including the matters taken on board today pertain to the revision of pay scales of the respondents in these matters pursuant to the recommendation of the 6th Pay Commission. The respondents succeeded before the High Courts and hence these SLPs/Civil Appeals by the Union of India.

In some of the matters, pursuant to High Court's orders, the Union of India has been paying its employees/respondents in terms of the orders of the High Court. In some of the matters, the respondents are not yet paid inspite of the fact that they succeeded before the High Court.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

In the circumstances, we are of the opinion that uniformity of the judicial process in all these matters be maintained. We decline to grant any interim order. The Union of India will pay the amounts due to the respondents

2

in terms of the decisions of the High Court impugned in each of these matters. Any such payment would be further subject to the final outcome of these matters.

We are informed that almost all the respondents/employees involved in these matters have considerably long period of service left. Therefore, it will not be difficult for the Union of India to take appropriate steps for the recovery of the amounts to be paid in case of the eventual success of the Union of India.

List the matters on 26th October, 2016 for final disposal.

(DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER