Union Of India Through The Secretary Govt Of India Ministry Of Finance Department Of Expenditure& Ors. vs. Vinit Jain& Ors.

¶ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.10 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 9986/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16/10/2014 in WP No. 16002/2014 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS K.V. RAMA RAJU AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 14/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr.Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, Adv. Ms. Disha Vaish, Adv. Mr. Jayant Mohan, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr.Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr.Adv. Mr. C. K. Rai,Adv. Mr. Paramhans, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Put up this case after four weeks on any non miscellaneous day. It is made clear that pendency of this special leave petition will not come in the way of the High Court, where similar matter is pending, to decide the same. ...2/- -2- Since order has been implemented in this case, no question of passing any interim order arise. Learned counsel for the respondents are at liberty to file reply. [INDU POKHRIYAL ] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S.