L. H. Sugar Factories vs. State Of U. P. Tax And Registration Through The Secretary

…........2

Ld.counsel for the respondent No.10 in SLP(C) No.2896/15 and respondent No.8 in SLP(C) No.2897/15 submits that as the application for impleadment has been allowed by order dated Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2015.07.29 15:55:23 IST Signature Not Verified

The office report indicates that the Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed the spare copies of the SLP after the period prescribed for such filing. The delay has been satisfactorily explained by the Ld.counsel. Therefore, the same is condoned, and, accordingly, notice shall be issued to the respondents with utmost dispatch.

For Respondent(s) M/s. Karanjawala & Co.,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

Mr.Abhinay,adv. M/s. Parekh & Co.,Adv.

For Petitioner(s) Mr.Varun Sarin,adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur,Adv.

O R D E R

Date : 27/07/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

report)

VERSUS

M/S L H SUGAR FACTORIES Petitioner(s)

(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing the spare copies and office

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2896-2897/2015

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

ITEM NO.70 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY

Reason:

STATE OF UP & ORS. Respondent(s)

06.05.2015 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers, they may be served with the copy of the pleadings. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve the complete set of pleadings to the above respondents within a week and file proof. Ld.counsel for the respondent Nos.8 & 10 are at liberty to file the counter affidavit within four weeks thereafter.

List the matter again on 12.10.2015.

(SURAJIT DEY) Registrar

SB