L. H. Sugar Factories vs. State Of U. P. Tax And Registration Through The Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)....../2015 CC No(s). 21041-21042/2014
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/09/2014 in CMWP No.1853- 1854/200 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)
M/S L H SUGAR FACTORIES Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF UP & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file SLP and office report)
Date : 19/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
13:10:12 IST Reason:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr.Adv. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Varun Sarin, Adv. | |||||
| Mr. Ashok Mathur,Adv. | |||||
For Respondent(s) Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rajiv Dutta, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. Mr.Naveen Chawla, Adv. Ms. Ruby S. Ahuja, Adv. Ms. Aakanksha Munjhal, Adv. Mr. Ishan Guar, Adv. M/s. Karanjawala & Co.,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
I.A.No.1-2/2014:
For the reasons stated in these Applications seeking permission to file SLPs, the I.As. are allowed. Digitally signed by Usha Rani Bhardwaj Date: 2015.01.24 Signature Not Verified
We have heard learned Counsel for the parties. We are informed that the State of U.P., Respondent herein has also filed a Special Leave Petition being SLP(C) Nos.1473-1474/2015. Let the said Special Leave Petitions be listed along with the present Petitions.
Issue notice.
Till the next date of hearing, the operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed.
We clarify that the Lucknow Bench hearing the W.P.No.6978(M/B) of 2008 and other matters, shall continue with the hearing and pronounce Judgment, without being influenced in any manner by the Judgment impugned before this Court.
Since Respondents 6 and 9 were, during the pendency of proceedings which culminated in the passing of the present Impugned Judgment, enjoying interim order, those interim orders shall continue till the next date of hearing.
(USHA BHARDWAJ) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER