Manilal Shamalbhai Patel (Deceased) Through His Legal Heirs vs. Officer On Special Duty (Land Acquisition)

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:25 Mar 2025
CNR:SCIN010384182015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal, Hon'ble S.V.N. Bhatti

Stage:

FOR JUDGEMENT

Remarks:

Case Allowed

Listed On:

25 Mar 2025

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.106 COURT NO.15 SECTION III

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 14670/2015

MANILAL SHAMALBHAI PATEL (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS & ORS. APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

OFFICER ON SPECIAL DUTY (LAND ACQUISITION) & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)

(I.A. D. No. 125277/2024-Substitution Application)

Date : 06-03-2025 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI

For Appellant(s) Mr. Neeraj K. Kaul, Sr. Adv. (argued by) Ms. Anushree Prashit Kapadia, AOR Mr. Dhruv Sharma, Adv. Ms. Dhanya Setlur Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Harsh Panwar, Adv. Ms. Pritha Suri, Adv. Ms. Shivangi Chawla, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR (argued by) Mr. Deepak Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1. The appellant No.6 is dead.

2. The proposed heirs and legal representatives of the said deceased appellant have applied for substitution. The application is within time and the proposed heirs and legal representatives are duly represented by the counsel.

3. Accordingly, the substitution is permitted and

I.A. D. No. 125277/2024 is allowed.

4. Let the heirs and legal representatives be substituted as appellant Nos.6.1, 6.2 and 6.3.

5. It has also been pointed out that the appellant No.1 has also passed away and her heirs and legal representatives are already on record as appellant Nos.2 to 5.

6. In view of the above, let an endorsement be made before the name of appellant No.1 that she is dead and her estate is represented by appellant Nos.2 to 5.

7. Amended memo of parties may be filed accordingly.

8. Heard Mr. Neeraj K. Kaul, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants and Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, learned counsel for the respondents.

9. Arguments concluded.

10. Judgment reserved.

(SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)

2

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(10) - 25 Mar 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(11) - 25 Mar 2025

Judgement - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 6 Mar 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 5 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 5 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 3 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 3 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 5 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 5 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 30 Nov 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 30 Nov 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view