M. C. D Of Delhi (N) vs. Dav College Trust
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Before:
Hon'ble B.V. Nagarathna, Hon'ble Augustine George Masih
Stage:
Direct Taxes Matter : Property Tax
Remarks:
List On (Date) [21-03-2024], List before court/bench [as item no.101]
Listed On:
20 Mar 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Order Text
ITEM NO.101 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV-A SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 149/2013 MUNICIPAL CORP OF DELHI Appellant(s) VERSUS SRI AUROBINDO EUDCATION SOCIETY . & ANR. Respondent(s) ([ GROUP MATTER ] [ AS ITEM NO. 101 ] IA No. 123393/2022 - EARLY HEARING APPLICATION) WITH C.A. No. 1102/2013 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1104/2013 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 18308/2017 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1103/2013 (XIV-A) SLP(C) No. 17978/2014 (XIV) SLP(C) No. 39787/2013 (XIV) SLP(C) No. 39786/2013 (XIV) SLP(C) No. 24732/2015 (XIV) C.A. No. 5935/2014 (XIV-A) SLP(C) No. 4926/2014 (XIV) SLP(C) No. 5344/2014 (XIV) SLP(C) No. 17980/2014 (XIV) C.A. No. 10728/2013 (XIV-A) (and IA No.22663/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS) C.A. No. 709/2013 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 696/2013 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 697/2013 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 695/2013 (XIV-A) atur<del>e Not</del> Verified A. No. 152/2013 (XIV-A) IST C.A. No. 698/2013 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 151/2013 (XIV-A)
contd..
- C.A. No. 150/2013 (XIV-A)
- C.A. No. 707/2013 (XIV-A)
- C.A. No. 18307/2017 (XIV-A)
- C.A. No. 18310/2017 (XIV-A)
- C.A. No. 18309/2017 (XIV-A)
- SLP(C) No. 24351-24359/2013 (XIV)
- C.A. No. 706/2013 (XIV-A)
- C.A. No. 704/2013 (XIV-A)
- C.A. No. 699/2013 (XIV-A)
- C.A. No. 701/2013 (XIV-A)
- C.A. No. 702/2013 (XIV-A)
- C.A. No. 18306/2017 (XIV-A)
- Date : 20-03-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.
- CORAM :
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
For Parties Mr. Rakesh Kumar-i, AOR Mr. Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR Mr. Ashwin Sakuja, Adv. Mr. Vedant Verma, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Pal, Adv. Mr. C.M. Sundaram, Adv. Mr. Kiritkumar Govindlal Sheth, Adv. Mr. Ashray Behura, Adv. Mr. Deepak Parashar, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr. Shagun Ruhil, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv. Ms. Payal Swarup, Adv. Mr. Devesh Maurya, Adv. Contd..
- 2 -
- 3 - Ms. Aditi Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr. Shagun Ruhil, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR Mr. Ashwin Sakuja, Adv. Mr. Vedant Verma, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Pal, Adv. Mr. Kiritkumar Govindlal Sheth, Adv. Mr. C.M. Sundaram, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, AOR Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. Hira Singh Rawat, Adv. Mr. Shiv Kumar Vats, Adv. Ms. Rajani Shahi, Adv. Mr. Subhash Chand Goyal, Adv. Mr. Amir Yadav, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Yadav, Adv. Ms. Shrishti Rawat, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Ram Narayan Mohanty, Adv. Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arjun Garg, Adv. Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR Mr. Nikunj Dayal, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Aditya Garg, Adv. Ms. N. Annapoorani, AOR Mr. Rahul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Sahay, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Agnihotri, Adv. Mr. Sagar Roy, Adv. Ms. Khushboo Tomar, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Mrs. Shubhangi Tuli, AOR Ms. Rakhi Ray, AOR Mr. S.S. Ray, Adv. Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Gulia, Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR
- 4 - Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, A.S.G. Mr. Arijit Prasad, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mrs. Niranjana Singh, Adv. Mr. Prashant Singh-ii, Adv. Mrs. Archana Pathak Dave, Adv. Mr. Anmol Chandan, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. Mrs. Kiran Suri, Adv. Ms. Diksha Rai, Adv. Mr. Prahlad Singh, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Sinha, Adv. Mr. Swayam Prabha Das, Adv. Mr. Prashant Singh-II, Adv.
Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is submitted at the Bar that item nos.101. 25 , i.e. C.A. No. 18309/2017 and 101.26, i.e., SLP(C) Nos. 24351- 24359/2013 do not pertain to schools and, therefore, the same may be segregated from rest of the cases. The submission is accepted.
Shri Sunil Gupta, learned senior counsel submitted that item no.101.13, i.e., C.A. No. 10728/2013 has also to be segregated as the impugned order of the Delhi High Court has been assailed by the writ petitioner(s) before the High Court and there are contentions other than the use factor which have been raised in the said case.
Registry to segregate these three items from rest of the cases and to list these cases for hearing separately.
Rest of the matters to be listed tomorrow, i.e., on 21.03.2024 as item no.101.
(NEETU SACHDEVA) (MALEKAR NAGARAJ) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order