Y. Mahabaleshwarappa vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Environment, Forest And Climate Change Secretary

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy, Satish Chandra Sharma
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:12 Nov 2024
CNR:SCIN010382942010

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7366-7367/2010

[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 26-02-2010 in WP No. 25910/2009 26-02-2010 in WP No. 26083/2009 26-02-2010 in WP No. 25910/2009 26-02-2010 in WP No. 26083/2009 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad]

GOVT.OF A.P. & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

M/S OBULAPURAM MINIG.CO.P.LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 32690-32691/2010 (XII-A)

W.P.(Crl.) No. 66/2010 (X)

SLP(C) No. 17064-17065/2010 (XII-A)

S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 16830/2010 (XII-A) (IA No. 1/2010 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 16829/2010 (XII-A) (IA No. 1/2010 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

W.P.(C) No. 411/2010 (X) (FOR ON IA 1/2010 FOR ON IA 40715/2011 FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 121370/2022 IA No. 121370/2022 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION)

W.P.(C) No. 76/2012 (X)

Date : 12-11-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI

For Petitioner(s)Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj, AOR
Dr. Sumant Bharadwaj, Adv.
Mr. Tanay Hari Har Lal, Adv.
Mr. Basava Prabhu Patil, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR
Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv.
M/S.<br>Lawyer S Knit & Co, AOR<br>Mr. T. V. Ratnam, AOR
Mr. Abhineet Arvind, Adv.<br>Mr. Merusagar Samantaray, AOR
Mr. P.B. Suresh, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Mayank Jain, Adv.<br>Mr. Parmatma Singh, AOR<br>Mr. Madhur Jain, Adv.<br>Mr. Arpit Goel, Adv.<br>Ms. Aakriti Dhawan, Adv.<br>Mr. Reshul Mittra, Adv.
Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, AOR<br>Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Gautam Bhatia, Adv.
Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR
For Respondent(s)Ms. Bharti Tyagi, AOR<br>Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, AOR
Mr. P.B. Suresh, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Mayank Jain, Adv.<br>Mr. Parmatma Singh, AOR<br>Mr. Madhur Jain, Adv.<br>Mr. Arpit Goel, Adv.<br>Ms. Aakriti Dhawan, Adv.<br>Mr. Reshul Mittra, Adv.
Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR<br>Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, AOR
Mr. G.v.r Choudary, Adv.<br>Ms. Kirti Goyel, Adv.<br>Mr. K. Shivraj Choudhuri, AOR
M/S.<br>Lawyer S Knit & Co, AOR
Mr. K. M. Nataraj, A.S.G.<br>Ms. Soniya Mathur, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv.<br>Mr. Sharath Nambier, Adv.<br>Saudamini Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. Pratyush Shrivastava, Adv.<br>Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR<br>Mrs. V. Mohna, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Nishant Patil, A.A.G. Mr. Anup P Shah, Adv. Mr. Vignesh Adithiya, Adv. Mr. D. L. Chidananda, AOR Mr. K. M. Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Sonia Mathur, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Adv. Ms. V Mohana, Adv. Ms. Saudamini Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pratyush Shrivastava, Adv. Ms. Ranjana Narayan, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. T. V. S. Raghavendra Sreyas, AOR Mr. Siddharth Vasudev, Adv. Ms. Gayatri Gulati, Adv. Ms. Sneh Dhillon, Adv. Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G. Ms. Sonia Mathur, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Ms. V Mohana, Adv. Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Adv. Mr. B K Satija, Adv. Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR Mr. Anurag Tiwary, Adv. M/S. Lex Regis Law Offices, AOR Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, Adv. Mr. Susheel Joseph Cyriac, Adv. Ms. Priya S. Bhalerao, Adv. Mr. Varun Kanwal, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. From the submissions made by the learned counsel, it appears that the iron ore mining operation in the area bordering the State of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, is stopped since 2009. Because

3

the mining area itself was a subject matter of dispute, the survey general had conducted an inquiry and gave the final report. The concerned authorities were then required to implement the said report and demarcate the respective boundaries of the two States. 3. To receive instruction on the current status and to clarify their respective stand, as prayed for, appropriate response is permitted to be filed within four weeks.

(NITIN TALREJA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(96) - 30 Apr 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(95) - 21 Apr 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(94) - 5 Mar 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(93) - 8 Jan 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(92) - 12 Dec 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(91) - 12 Nov 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(90) - 3 Sept 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(89) - 23 Jul 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(88) - 30 Apr 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(87) - 17 Apr 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(86) - 18 Jan 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(85) - 10 Jan 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(84) - 9 Dec 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(83) - 26 Aug 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(82) - 22 Aug 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(81) - 21 Jul 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(80) - 18 Jul 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(79) - 19 May 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(78) - 31 Mar 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(77) - 21 Jan 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(76) - 17 Sept 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(75) - 11 Sept 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(74) - 20 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(73) - 27 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(72) - 2 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(71) - 3 Apr 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(70) - 8 Dec 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(69) - 14 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(67) - 21 Nov 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(68) - 21 Nov 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(65) - 31 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(66) - 31 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(63) - 1 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(64) - 1 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(62) - 21 Jul 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(61) - 7 Jul 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(60) - 2 May 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(59) - 21 Apr 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(57) - 10 Mar 2014

Office Report

Click to view

Order(58) - 10 Mar 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(55) - 3 Mar 2014

Office Report

Click to view

Order(56) - 3 Mar 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(54) - 10 Feb 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(53) - 20 Jan 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(51) - 13 Jan 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(52) - 13 Jan 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(50) - 11 Nov 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(49) - 28 Oct 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(48) - 21 Oct 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(47) - 16 Sept 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(46) - 9 Sept 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(45) - 26 Aug 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(44) - 4 May 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(43) - 20 Apr 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(42) - 13 Apr 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(41) - 16 Mar 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(40) - 10 Feb 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 18 Nov 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(38) - 23 Sept 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(37) - 19 Aug 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(36) - 5 Aug 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(35) - 29 Jul 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(34) - 15 Jul 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 6 May 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(32) - 2 May 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 29 Apr 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 25 Apr 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 21 Apr 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 15 Apr 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 8 Apr 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 11 Mar 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 4 Mar 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 25 Feb 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 18 Feb 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 11 Feb 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 28 Jan 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 21 Jan 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 14 Jan 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 7 Jan 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 4 Jan 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 19 Nov 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 15 Nov 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 16 Jul 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 16 Jun 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 24 May 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(11) - 13 May 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(9) - 10 May 2010

Judgment - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 10 May 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 4 May 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 3 May 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 30 Apr 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 23 Apr 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 12 Apr 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 9 Apr 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 22 Mar 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 11 Mar 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search