Y. Mahabaleshwarappa vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Environment, Forest And Climate Change Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7366-7367/2010
[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 26-02-2010 in WP No. 25910/2009 26-02-2010 in WP No. 26083/2009 26-02-2010 in WP No. 25910/2009 26-02-2010 in WP No. 26083/2009 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad]
GOVT.OF A.P. & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M/S OBULAPURAM MINIG.CO.P.LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 32690-32691/2010 (XII-A)
W.P.(Crl.) No. 66/2010 (X)
SLP(C) No. 17064-17065/2010 (XII-A)
S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 16830/2010 (XII-A) (IA No. 1/2010 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 16829/2010 (XII-A) (IA No. 1/2010 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
W.P.(C) No. 411/2010 (X) (FOR ON IA 1/2010 FOR ON IA 40715/2011 FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 121370/2022 IA No. 121370/2022 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION)
W.P.(C) No. 76/2012 (X)
Date : 12-11-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
For Petitioner(s) | Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj, AOR |
---|---|
Dr. Sumant Bharadwaj, Adv. | |
Mr. Tanay Hari Har Lal, Adv. | |
Mr. Basava Prabhu Patil, Sr. Adv. | |
Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR | |
Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv. |
Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv. | |
---|---|
M/S.<br>Lawyer S Knit & Co, AOR<br>Mr. T. V. Ratnam, AOR | |
Mr. Abhineet Arvind, Adv.<br>Mr. Merusagar Samantaray, AOR | |
Mr. P.B. Suresh, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Mayank Jain, Adv.<br>Mr. Parmatma Singh, AOR<br>Mr. Madhur Jain, Adv.<br>Mr. Arpit Goel, Adv.<br>Ms. Aakriti Dhawan, Adv.<br>Mr. Reshul Mittra, Adv. | |
Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, AOR<br>Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Gautam Bhatia, Adv. | |
Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR | |
For Respondent(s) | Ms. Bharti Tyagi, AOR<br>Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, AOR |
Mr. P.B. Suresh, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Mayank Jain, Adv.<br>Mr. Parmatma Singh, AOR<br>Mr. Madhur Jain, Adv.<br>Mr. Arpit Goel, Adv.<br>Ms. Aakriti Dhawan, Adv.<br>Mr. Reshul Mittra, Adv. | |
Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR<br>Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, AOR | |
Mr. G.v.r Choudary, Adv.<br>Ms. Kirti Goyel, Adv.<br>Mr. K. Shivraj Choudhuri, AOR | |
M/S.<br>Lawyer S Knit & Co, AOR | |
Mr. K. M. Nataraj, A.S.G.<br>Ms. Soniya Mathur, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv.<br>Mr. Sharath Nambier, Adv.<br>Saudamini Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. Pratyush Shrivastava, Adv.<br>Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR<br>Mrs. V. Mohna, Sr. Adv. |
Mr. Nishant Patil, A.A.G. Mr. Anup P Shah, Adv. Mr. Vignesh Adithiya, Adv. Mr. D. L. Chidananda, AOR Mr. K. M. Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Sonia Mathur, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Adv. Ms. V Mohana, Adv. Ms. Saudamini Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pratyush Shrivastava, Adv. Ms. Ranjana Narayan, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. T. V. S. Raghavendra Sreyas, AOR Mr. Siddharth Vasudev, Adv. Ms. Gayatri Gulati, Adv. Ms. Sneh Dhillon, Adv. Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G. Ms. Sonia Mathur, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Ms. V Mohana, Adv. Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Adv. Mr. B K Satija, Adv. Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR Mr. Anurag Tiwary, Adv. M/S. Lex Regis Law Offices, AOR Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, Adv. Mr. Susheel Joseph Cyriac, Adv. Ms. Priya S. Bhalerao, Adv. Mr. Varun Kanwal, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. From the submissions made by the learned counsel, it appears that the iron ore mining operation in the area bordering the State of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, is stopped since 2009. Because
3
the mining area itself was a subject matter of dispute, the survey general had conducted an inquiry and gave the final report. The concerned authorities were then required to implement the said report and demarcate the respective boundaries of the two States. 3. To receive instruction on the current status and to clarify their respective stand, as prayed for, appropriate response is permitted to be filed within four weeks.
(NITIN TALREJA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR