Y. Mahabaleshwarappa vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Environment, Forest And Climate Change Secretary

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.4 SECTION XII-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).7366-7367/2010

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-02-2010 in WP No. 25910/2009, WP No. 26083/2009 passed by the High Court of A.P. at Hyderabad)

GOVT.OF A.P. & ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

M/S OBULAPURAM MINING.CO.P.LTD. & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)

(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 1-2/2010 FOR APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION FILED BY MS. BHARTI TYAGI, ADVOCATE ON IA 7-8/2010 FOR APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION FILED BY MS. BHARTI TYAGI, ADVOCATE ON IA 9-10/2010 FOR APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION FILED BY MR. P. V. DINESH, ADVOCATE ON IA 13-14/2010 FOR APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS ON IA 15-16/2011 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION FILED BY MR. K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI, ADVOCATE ON IA 21-22/2013FOR APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT FILED BY MR. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN, ADVOCATE IN SLP (C) NO.7366-7367 OF 2010 AND REPORT OF CEC IN I.A.NOS.23-24 OF 2013 ON IA 23-24/2012 FOR APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION FILED BY MR. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN, ADVOCATE ON IA ......./2012FOR APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS FILED BY MR. BHARTI TYAGI, ADVOCATE ON I.A. …..../2012 and IA No.127918/2017-impleading party and IA No.127920/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 32690-32691/2010 (XII-A)

W.P.(Crl.) No. 66/2010 (X)

SLP(C) No. 17064-17065/2010 (XII-A) (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR VACATION OF STAY ON IA NO. ....../2010)

S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 16830/2010 (XII-A) (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2010)

S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 16829/2010 (XII-A) (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2010)

W.P.(C) No. 411/2010 (X) W.P.(C) No. 76/2012 (X) Digitally signed by SANJAY KUMAR Date: 2017.12.08 17:37:34 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

SLP(C) No. 15659-15684/2011 (IV-A) (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP ON IA 1/2011) SLP(C) No. 15655-15658/2011 (IV-A) (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP ON IA 1/2011) Date : 08-12-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Annam D. N. Rao, AOR Dr. Sumant Bharadwaj, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sagar Roy, Adv. Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj, AOR Mr. T. V. Ratnam, AOR Mr. M. Sowri Dev, Adv. Mr. P. V. Dinesh, AOR Mr. Merusagar Samantaray, AOR Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR Mr. Uday Manaktala, Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. G.N. Reddy, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Pinki Anand, ASG Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. Syeed Tanweer Ahmed, Adv. Ms. Ranjana Narayan, Adv. Ms. Saudamini Sharma, Adv. Mr. Robin Majumdar, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Jain, Adv. Mr. Sumit Teterwal, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr. Shankar Chillarge, Adv. Mr. Piyush Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Shreyasi, Adv. For M/S. Lawyer S Knit & Co. Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.D. Singh, Adv.

2

Ms. Bharti Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Surabhi Sukla, Adv. Mr. Ram Kripal singh, Adv. Ms. Shweta Sinha, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, AOR Mr. G. Umapathy, Adv. Mr. Aleo G. Rozario, Adv. Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. G.V.R. Choudary, Adv. Mr. K. Shivraj Choudhuri, AOR Mr. A. Chandra Sekhar, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jha, Adv. Mr. P. V. Dinesh, AOR Mr. Sridhar Potaraju, AOR Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR Mr. Uday Manaktala, Adv. Mr. S.K. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR

Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The Surveyor General of India and his team of officers will coordinate with the Chief Secretary of Karnataka and the Chief Secretary of Andhra Pradesh in determining the boundary between the States of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh.

The exercise to the extent possible should be completed within a period of 12 weeks.

List the matter after 12 weeks.

It is made clear that if there is any dispute in the method of demarcation of the boundary, the Surveyor

3

General will take a final decision in the matter.

(SANJAY KUMAR-I) (KAILASH CHANDER) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER