The State Of West Bengal vs. Chinmay Singha
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble V. Ramasubramanian, Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Notice Issued and Stay Granted
Listed On:
24 Mar 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
193216/2022,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.35 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVI
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1024-1025/2023
WEST BENGAL CENTRAL SCHOOL SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SANDEEP PRASAD & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH SLP(C) No. 22731-22732/2022 (XVI)
Date : 06-11-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Rohit Bansal, Adv. Ms. Kshitij Singh, Adv. Mr. Sohhom Sau, Adv.
- Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, AOR
- Ms. Shreya Bhojnagarwala, Adv.
- Ms. Shubhangi Pandey, Adv.
- Ms. Parul Shukla, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, AOR
- Ms. Shreya Bhojnagarwala, Adv.
- Digitally signed by PRIYANKA MALIK Date: 2023.11.10 10:46:36 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
- Mr. Rauf Rahim, AOR
- Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, AOR
- Mr. Siddhesh Shirish Kotwal, Adv.
- Mr. Tejasvi Gupta, Adv.
contd….
Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Adv.
Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Rohit Bansal, Adv. Ms. Kshitij Singh, Adv. Mr. Sohhom Sau, Adv.
Mr. Arup Banerjee, AOR Ms. Arunima Shrivastava, Adv. Mr. Priyanshu Raj, Adv.
Mr. Robin Khokhar, AOR
Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR Ms. Abhivyakti Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Ravi Shanker Jha, Adv. Ms. Pooja, Adv. Mr. Purushottam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C) No. 1024-1025/2023
Opportunity to respondent Nos.1,2 and 5 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of the unserved respondents, however, an Affidavit of dasti service in respect of unserved respondents has been filed stating therein that notices have been issued to the respondents through Speed post. It is not as per rules.
-2-
contd….
Service is complete on the remaining respondents, but none has entered appearance.
SLP(C) No. 22731-22732/2022
Opportunity to respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4, 100, 435, 467 to 470 and 517 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.
Respondent Nos.5-11 have already opted not to file counter affidavit.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time, as last opportunity, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of the unserved respondent Nos.269, 466, 498 & 500.
Service is complete on the remaining respondents, but none has entered appearance.
List again on 14.12.2023.