Y. Jaihind Reddy vs. B. R. Subhash Babu
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
2 Sept 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
TTEM NO. $61$
COURT NO.13
SECTION XTT-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.19855/2024
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-08-2024 in IA No. 3/2023 passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad)
Y. JAIHIND REDDY
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
B.R. SUBHASH BABU & ORS.
Respondent(s)
(IA No. 192595/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
Date: 02-09-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Navin Pahwa, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vinay P Tripathi, Adv. Mr. B. Shravanth Shanker, AOR Mr. Shivam Kunal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. B Adinarayana Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Goli Rama Krishna, Adv.
Ms. Vandana Sharma, AOR
Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Adv.
Ms. Karishma Seth, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
$\mathbf{1}$ Heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the material placed on record.
Issue notice, returnable after four weeks. $2.$
Signal@enotvermes. Vandana Sharma, learned Advocate-on-Record, who is appearing Respondent No.1, on caveat, accepts notice. Hence, formal notice to the said respondent is dispensed with. She seeks time to file counter affidavit.
$\mathbf{4}$ . Let notices be issued to the other respondents.
5. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.
6. The pleadings be completed by the parties.
7. In the meantime, the proceedings of AS No.320 of 2023 are stayed, till the next date of hearing.
(VISHAL ANAND) (MAMTA RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)