ITEM NO.63

REGISTRAR COURT. 1

SECTION IVA

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). $21241/2015$

SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LTD.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

Respondent(s)

<pre>(with interim relief and office report)</pre>

WITH

SLP(C) No. $33293/2015$ (With appln.(s) for impleadment and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. $32316-32318/2015$ (With appln.(s) for impleadment and Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. $34665-34667/2015$ (With appln.(s) for impleadment and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. $26935-26937/2015$ SLP(C) No. $25872-25874/2015$ SLP(C) No. $33142-33144/2015$ SLP(C) No. $252-254/2016$

Date: 23/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr C.M.Angadi, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. Not Verified Ms Surabhi Aggarwal, Adv. Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Adv. Mr K.P.Singh, Adv. Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) NO.21241/2015

Respondent no.1 has already filed counter affidavit.

None appears for respondent nos.2 to 4 despite due service.

Ld. Counsel appearing for respondent no.5 submits that he does not want to file counter affidavit.

In IA No.3, reply has been filed but is defective.

SLP(C) NO.26935-37/2015

Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit.

None appears for respondent no.4 despite due service.

Despite last opportunity granted, fresh steps for service of respondent no.3 have not been taken.

Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.

In IA Nos. 10 to 12, no reply has been received.

SLP(C) NO.25872-74/2015

Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit. None appears for respondent no.4 despite due service.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.3 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued.

In I No. 7 to 9, ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed reply but no reply has been filed by respondent nos. 3 and 4.

Item No.63

SLP(C) NO.33293/2015

Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit.

None appears for respondent no.3 despite due service.

The ld. Counsel for respondent no.5 submits that he does not want to file counter affidavit.

Despite last opportunity granted, fresh steps for service of respondent no.4 have not been taken.

Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.

SLP(C) NO.33142-44/2015

Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit.

None appears for respondent no.3 despite due service.

Despite last opportunity granted, fresh steps for service of respondent nos.4 and 5 have not been taken.

Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.

SLP(C) NO.32316-18/2015

Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit.

Opportunity to respondent nos. 11 and 13 to file counter affidavit has been declined.

None appears for respondent nos. 3 to 10,12,14 and 15 despite due service.

Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters.

Item No.63

SLP(C) NO.34665-67/2015

Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit.

Respondent no.3 is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit.

SLP(C) NO.252-254/2016

Respondent nos. 1 and 5 have filed counter affidavit.

None appears for respondent nos. 2 to 4,6,7,9 to 16,18 despite due service.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos. 8 and 17 within two weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued.

List again on 28.10.2016.

(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar