Samaj Bachao Mission Committee Through Its President Shri Balkar Singh Dhillon vs. Union Of India And Ors. Ministry Of Home Affairs Through The Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
20 Jan 2016
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.73 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XV SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K. ARUL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 24900-24901/2015 LEK RAJ AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ARRIVE SAFE SOCIETY OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS. $Respondent(s)$ (With interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. $25838/2015$ (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. $25840/2015$ (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. $24986-24987/2015$ (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. $25841/2015$ (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date: 15/03/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prasenjit Pritam, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Shantanu Sagar, Adv. Mr. Dillip Kumar nayak, Adv. Mr. T. Gopal, Adv. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Adv. Mr. Kunal Narain, Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Suchita Sharma, Adv. Mr. Manish Vashishtha, Adv. Ms. Veena rattan, Adv. Ms. Pratibha Jain, Adv. Mr. Kunal Narain, Adv. Mr. Puneet Parihar, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
$\ldots$ contd.2/-
SLP(C)Nos. 24986-24987/2015
Respondent no. 1 has not filed counter affidavit. Four weeks time is granted for filing the same.
Respondent nos. 2, 4 and 5 have filed counter affidavit.
Service on respondent no. 3 is not complete. As respondent no. 3 is common in all the matters, vakalatnama, if any, be filed within next hearing.
SLP(C)NOs. 24900-24901/2015 and 25838/2015
Respondent nos. 2, 5 and 6 have filed counter affidavit.
Four weeks time is granted to respondent no. 1 for filing counter affidavit.
Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent nos. 3 and 4 have not filed counter affidavit. As such, further opportunity is declined.
SLP(C)Nos. 25840/2015 and 25841/2015
Respondent nos. 2, 5 and 6 have filed counter affidavit.
Four weeks time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent no. 1 for filing counter affidavit.
Service on respondent nos. 3 and 4 is not complete. As respondent nos. 3 and 4 are common in all the matters, learned Counsel representing them can also file vakalatnama in the meanwhile.
Learned Counsel for petitioners is directed to serve copy of pleadings on respondent no. 1 in all the matters in the meanwhile.
List again on 4.7.2016.
(DR. K. ARUL) Registrar
-2-