National Capital Territory Of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble M.R. Shah
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:24 Mar 2023
CNR:SCIN010377352022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble M.R. Shah, Hon'ble C.T. Ravikumar

Stage:

FOR JUDGEMENT

Listed On:

24 Mar 2023

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.47

COURT NO.4

SECTION XIV

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 37735/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15-01-2018 in WP(C) No. 12143/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)

NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SUBHASH CHANDER KHATRI & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.203191/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.203193/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE <pre>IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)</pre>

Date: 24-03-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR

For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sujeeta Srivastava, AOR

For Respondent(s) Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj, AOR

Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal, AOR Mr. Bhuvan Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Saransh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Diqvijav Dam, Adv. Ms. Shivika Mehra, Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$

In the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into consideration the merits of the case and the law laid down by the Constitution Bench of this Court in the case of Indore Development atu<del>re Not</del> Verifi A. Zhority vs. <u>Manoharlal & Ors. Etc.</u> reported in 2020 (8) SCC 129 $\begin{array}{c}\n10.10116.1016.1016.1016.1016.1016.1016.$ and as the possession of the land in question was already taken over and was handed over to the beneficiary Department, thereafter

there is no question of any compensation to be paid under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, delay caused in preferring the Special Leave Petition is condoned.

Leave granted.

Arguments concluded.

Order reserved.

(R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR