Shobha Kumari vs. Nikhil Prasad C/O. Manoj Kumar

IN THE SUPFIEME COURT OF INDIA-CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

THANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 0 6 2015 $91 - 12$

Pelllioner ·

: Respondent

ISTRAR COUR

AWK MOITS

No Hol Bradad <u>OFFICE HEPOP</u>

The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Hon ble Court / Ld. Registrar Court on $\sqrt{2}$ , $\sqrt{2}$ - $/6$ , 201 when the Court / he was granted / directed Await service of sole responded. Ad on $-9 - 3 - 76$

$\int$ and $\int$ 37 NOT READY / FOR THE REASON: Accordingly, Notice was issued to the sole Respondent through Registered A.D. Post on $f = 1 - 16$ as well as Dasti filtrough Trial Court.

It is submitted that unserved cover containing the notice has been received $\mathbf 2$ back from sole Respondent with the Postal remarks,"

$3.$ $\ldots$ It is submilled that neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover has been received back from sole respondent so far.

It is submitted that A.D. Card duly signed by the sole Respondent has been. received but no one has filed Vakaldinama and memo of appearance on his behalf $50$ far.

It is submilted that Service Report has been received from the Tilal Court stating $\mathcal{F}$ therein that

.<br>The counsel has filed an Affidavit of service after effecting Dasti service an the Respondent No. 11. 1 / has not filed Affidavit of service of dasti notice.

-SERVICE OF NOTICE IS NOT COMPLETE

$\sim$ The matter (g) is / gre-listed before the Court of Ld. Pregistrar with this Office Report. . Dated this the $\mathscr X$ day of $\mathscr S\mathscr I\circ\mathscr U$ . $2013 -$ モコロビー CODY to: Month Shown Solla Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.