Shobha Kumari vs. Nikhil Prasad C/O. Manoj Kumar

IN THE SUPFIEME COURT OF INDIA-CIVIL OFIIGINAL JURISDICTION

TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. $3%$ OF 2015

Stortha Kumari ....Pelllioner * VERSUS Nithil project. ......Respondent

OFFICE REPORT

The Transfer Pellilon above meniloned was listed before the Hon'ble Court / tel-Registran Court on $7 - 12$ / $\zeta$ 201 when the Court / he was granted / directed Disine votice à

<u>NOT</u> READY FOR THE REASON. I are

Accordingly, Notice was issued to the sole Respondent through Registered A.D. Post on $6 - 1 - 6$ as well as Dasti / Hirough Trial Sourt. 2

It is submitted that unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from sole Respondent with the Postal remarks, " $\hat{\phantom{a}}$

$3.4$ $\cdot$ It is submitted that neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover has been received back from sole respondent so far.

If is submitted that A.D. Card duly signed by the sole Respondent has been. received but no one has filed Vakalainama and memo of appearance on his behalf

ll is submilited that Service Report thes been received from The Tilal Court stating $5 -$ Therein that

The counsel has filed an Affidavit of service after effecting Dasti service an the Respondent No. (In as not filed Affidavit of service of dash notice.

SERVICE OF NOTICE IS NOT COMPLETE. The matter $(\mathscr{A})$ is $\mathscr{A}$ re ilsted before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report.

Dated this the $y$ - day of $y$ - $z$ / $6$ $2013$ ODV10 : Vos fu Starma Lelley Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR _n assistant registrar ,