Delhi Elect. Regult. Commission Through Its Secretary vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Through Its Authorised Signatory Mr. R. C. Mehta
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
22 Jan 2010
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 884/2010 DELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Appellant(s) VERSUS B.S.E.S RAJDHANI POWER LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and permission to file additional documents and vacating interim order and office report) [FOR FINAL DISPOSAL] WITH C.A. No. 980/2010 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing counter affidavit and c/delay in filing rejoinder and directions and permission to file additional documents and stay and vacating interim order and Office Report) C.A. No. 9003-9004/2011 (With prayer for and vacating interim order and Office Report) W.P.(C) No. 104/2014 (With appln.(s) for directions and extension of time and interim relief and permission to place on record addl. Affidavit.) W.P.(C) No. 105/2014 (With appln.(s) for directions and permission to place on record addl. Affidavit) C.P. (C) No. 141/2014 in W.P.(C) No. 328/1999 (With appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and Signature Not Verified
Office Report) Digitally signed by Pardeep Kumar Date: 2014.09.09 18:15:41 SAST Reason:
C.A. No. 1854-1855/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and Office Report) 2
C.A. No. 4010/2014 (With appln.(s) exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and Office Report)
ITEM NO.203 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
| C.A. No. 4011/2014 | (With appln.(s) for ex-parte stay and exemption from filing c/c of<br>the impugned judgment and Office Report) |
|---|---|
| C.A. No. 4012/2014<br>judgment and and ex-parte stay) | (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned |
| C.A. No. 4013/2014<br>judgment and Office Report) | (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned |
| Date : 08/09/2014 This matters were called on for hearing today. | |
| CORAM : | HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN |
| For Appellant(s) | |
| DERC | Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Subramonium Prasad , Adv.<br>Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv. |
| BSES Yamuna &<br>BSES Rajdhani | Mr.<br>Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr.<br>K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Amit Kapur, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Anupam Varma, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Visal Anand, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Rahul, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Adv. |
| Mr.<br>M.G. Ramachandran, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>K. V. Mohan , Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Vinod Kirti Singh, Adv.<br>Ms.<br>Poorva Saigal, Adv.<br>3 | |
| Damodar Valley<br>Corporation | Mr.<br>H.P. Raval, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Swetketu Mishra, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Anando Mukerjee, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Siddhartha Chowdhury , Adv.<br>Ms.<br>Divya Anand, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Ritin Ray, Adv. |
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Dushyant Manochar, Adv. for<br>M/s Suresh A. Shroff & Co. |
| Mr.<br>Tushar Mehta, A.S.G.<br>Mr.<br>S. Wasim A. Qadri, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Harsha Peechara, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Zaid Ali, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>T. Qadri, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Lakshmi Raman Singh, Adv. | |
| Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG<br>Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Adv. |
Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. Mr. M.G. Ramachandran, Adv. Mr. K. V. Mohan , Adv. Mr. Vinod Kirti Singh, Adv. Ms. Poorva Saigal, Adv. BSES Yamuna & BSES Rajdhani Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amit Kapur, Adv. Mr. Anupam Varma, Adv. Mr. Visal Anand, Adv. Mr. Rahul, Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar , Adv. Mr. Uttam Datt, Adv. Mr. Shubhan Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. T.V.S. Raghavendra Sreyas, Adv. PGCIL Mr. M.G. Ramachandran, Adv. Mr. Pramod Dayal, Adv. Mr. Nikunj Dayal, Adv. Ms. Paayal Dayal, Adv. DERC Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad , Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv. 4 Damodar Valley Corporation Mr. Swetketu Mishra, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury , Adv. NHPC Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv. Ms. Manali Singhal, Adv. Mr. Santosh Sachin, Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R According to Office Report, in C.A. Nos. 1854-1855 of 2014 and C.A. Nos. 9003-9004 of 2011, service is not yet complete. Advocate-on-records for the appellant in the above matters are directed to take fresh steps for service on the unserved respondents, returnable in four weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. List this group of matters thereafter.
(PARDEEP KUMAR) (RENU DIWAN) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER