Vineeth P vs. Haridasan V
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble R. Subhash Reddy, Hon'ble Aniruddha Bose
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [4]
Listed On:
24 Aug 2021
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.7 <pre>Court 12 (Video Conferencing)</pre> SECTION XI-A SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33174/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31-08-2017 in WPC No. 32574/2014 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam) VINEETH P & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARIDASAN V & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 33164/2017 (XI-A) IA No. 1959/2019 - MODIFICATION) SLP(C) No. 36451-36453/2017 (XI-A) IA No. 131565/2018 - EARLY HEARING APPLICATION) SLP(C) No. 36461/2017 (XI-A) $SLP(C)$ No. 33329-33331/2017 (XI-A) (IA No. 130625/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 36457/2017 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 33337/2017 (XI-A) $SLP(C)$ No. 36460/2017 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 33915-33921/2017 (XI-A) $SLP(C)$ No. 34303/2017 (XI-A) (IA No. 134723/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 34322-34323/2017 (XI-A) (IA No. 134760/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 36467/2017 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 36465/2017 (XI-A) $SLP(C)$ No. 533-535/2018 (XI-A) IA No. 3413/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION) ature Not Verifie $\frac{1}{100} \frac{1}{90} \frac{1}{2} P(C)$ No. 3844-3846/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 19403/2018 (XI-A)
SLP(C) No. 26396/2018 (XI-A)
SLP(C) No. 26904-26905/2018 (XI-A)
Date : 24-08-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jayant Muthraj, Sr. Adv. Mr. Roy Abraham, Adv. Ms. Reena Roy, Adv. Ms. Samitharani M.R., Adv. Mr. Akhil Abraham, Adv. Dr. K.P. Kylasnatha Pillay, Sr. Adv. Ms. Rashmi Singhania, AOR Mr. Mahesh Menon, Adv. Mr. Shinoj K. Narayanan, Adv. Mr. Karthik S D, Adv. Mr. Ranjith K. C., AOR Mr. P. V. Dinesh, AOR Mr. Thomas P. Joseph, Sr. Adv. Mr. A. Karthik, Adv. Mr. Govind Manoharan, Adv. Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, AOR Mr. R. Basant, Sr. Adv. Mr. Raghenth Basant, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR Mr. Manu Krishnan, Adv. Ms. Roopali Lakhotia, Adv. Mr. Raji Joseph, AOR Mr. Himinder Lal, AOR Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohammed Sadique T.A., AOR Mrs. Anu K. Joy, Adv. Mr. Amith Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Abraham C. Mathews, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jishnu M. L., AOR Mr. P. V. Dinesh, AOR
Mr. G. Prakash, AOR Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Adv. Ms. Beena Prakash, Adv.
Mr. Rupesh Kumar, AOR Ms. Neelam Sharma, Adv. Ms. Pankhuri Shrivastava, Adv Mr. Alekshendra Sharma, Adv.
Mr. A. Raghunath, AOR Ms. Sumita Hazarika, AOR
Mr. Himinder Lal, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Further affidavit dated 28th July, 2020 is filed by the Administrator and Secretary, Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee, Guruvayur, Thrissur District, Kerala. In the said affidavit, it is stated that after considering various complaints a list is prepared to regularize the services of those temporary employees, who have completed 10 years of service as on 30.06.2018.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/temporary employees have submitted that there is no reason for not regularizing services of those employees who have completed 10 years by this time. It is also further submitted that category of those employees were replaced by another set of temporary employees and in view of such artificial break, they were deprived of regularization.
Learned Senior counsel Mr. R. Venkataramani, appearing for Guruvayur Devaswom Board is requested to obtain instructions in the matter to indicate how many temporary employees were in such category as mentioned above, before we proceed further in the matter.
Matters be listed after four weeks for further consideration.
(NEETA SAPRA) (DIPTI KHURANA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
3