National Human Rights Commission Through Its Secretary General vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
1 Dec 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 1012 OF 2014
(UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA)
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ...PETITIONER
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS
-VERSUS-
OFFICE- REPORT
The Writ Petition alongwith application above-mentioned was listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 14.10.2015, with office report dated 13.10.2015, when the following order was passed:
"Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of respondent Nos.3,17, 21 26 & 35 within four weeks.
The respondent Nos.7 & 25 have already filed the counter affidavit. The respondent No.9 is directed to serve the copy of the counter affidavit on the respondent No.15 within one week and file proof.
Ld.counsel for the respondent No.37 has already filed the counter affidavit but he has failed to file the vakalatnama. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks file the vakalatnama failing which the counter affidavit filed by him shall be taken off the record. List the matter again on 12.01.2016."
It is submitted that Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy and Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Advocates have filed filed counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 20, 28 and 29 respectively (copy of the counter affidavits have been included in the paper book). M/s. K.J. John and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocates has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent nos. 7 and 17 respectively but they have not filed counter affidavit so far.
It is further submitted that counsel for respondent no. 37 has not filed vakalatnama so far.
It is further submitted that the counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps for service of notice on the unserved respondent nos. 3, 11, 26 & 35.
Service of notice is not complete in respect of respondent Nos. 3, 11, 26 and 35.
The writ petition above-mentioend listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this office report.
Dated this the 11th day of January, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to: Ms. Shobha, Advocate Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Advocate Mr. C.D. Singh, Advocate Mr. Anip Sachthey, Advocate Ms. G. Indira, Advocate M/s. Corporate Law Group, Advocates Mr. Abhinav Mukherji, Advocate Mr. Gopal Singh, Advocate Mr. Tapesh Kr. Singh, Advocate
Ms. Liz Mathew, Advocate Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Advocate Mr. Milind Kumar, Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Advocate Mr. Shree Pal Singh, Advocate Mr. P.V. Yogeshwaran, Advocate Ms. Sushma Suri, Advocate Mr. D.S. Mahra, Advocate Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate
Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, Advocate
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR